33 GCs Sign Letter Backing Proposal to Lift California Restrictions on In-House Pro Bono
Legal leaders from Salesforce, Uber and other California-based have signed a letter supporting proposed changes to state bar requirements around in-house pro bono work.
November 08, 2018 at 03:21 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Legal leaders from Salesforce, Uber and other California-based companies have backed proposed revisions to state restrictions on in-house pro bono work.
More than 30 general counsel and chief legal officers, including Uber's Tony West and Salesforce's Amy Weaver, have signed a letter supporting the Association of Corporate Counsel's recommended changes to proposed revisions from the California State Bar on California Rule of Court 9.46 and California Rule of the State Bar 3.372.
“It was a really burdensome system that California had set up, so when we heard that California was looking at re-examining its special admission rules, we reached out to the committee and said, 'Hey we've been involved in a lot of other states' efforts to change their pro bono rules as applied to in-house counsel, can we offer some suggestions,” said Mary Blatch, the ACC's associate general counsel and director of advocacy.
The state bar's proposals, if passed, would eliminate the requirement for registered in-house counsel who are not licensed in the state of California but work in-house in the state to also become a registered legal services attorney. Current proposals also would allow RIHC to do pro bono work through their employer.
In Monday's ACC letter, the organization recommended the California state bar also remove the requirement for RIHC to use that title and no other in their job related activities, a rule the ACC letter stated leads to “unnecessary confusion between organizational roles and the registration status of in-house counsel.”
The ACC also recommended additional changes to California Rule of Court 9.46, including the expanding “eligible legal aid organization” for RIHC to include nonprofits and criminal justice work, the removal of RIHC's required supplemental form to provide pro bono services and that RIHC's pro bono work not be required to be supervised by a licensed California attorney.
“If they didn't have to supervise a person who was not licensed in California, they could take on a separate matter of their own. It takes up resources,” Blatch said. “Registered in-house counsel, they are licensed attorneys who have been admitted in other states. The need for them to be supervised is very low in our estimation.
Blatch said that pro bono efforts in corporate legal departments have become increasingly popular in recent years, with many in-house teams partnering with outside organizations and law firms.
“I think, just like all members of the bar, in-house counsel want to be able to give back, and a great way for attorneys to do so is to provide pro bono legal services that only attorneys can provide,” she said.
In addition to Salesforce and Uber, those signed their names on the letter supporting the ACC's recommendations included Macy's CLO Elisa Garcia; The Gap EVP and global GC Julie Gruber; Accenture GC and CCO Chad Jerdee; Bank of America global GC David Leitch; PayPal SVP and general counsel Wanji Walcott; and Verizon EVP of public policy and general counsel Craig Silliman.
Read the GCs' letter below:
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCollectible Maker Funko Wins Motion to Dismiss Securities Class Action
How Tony West Used Transparency to Reform Uber's Toxic Culture
What Paul Grewal Has Learned About Advocacy as Coinbase's Top Lawyer
7 minute readShowered With Stock, Tech GCs Incentivized to 'Knock It Out of the Park'
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250