Next Generation Women Leaders in Tech Law 2018: Julia Kropp, Farella Braun + Martel
Kropp says the best part of working in tech law is "stretching my brain, learning about new things all the time and working with really creative clients."
November 12, 2018 at 09:44 PM
4 minute read
Julia Kropp, an associate at Farella, took an active role for BladeRoom Group in trade secrets and intellectual property litigation over the design and construction of a $200 million Facebook data center in Sweden. At trial, she conducted the examination of one of the most senior Facebook employee who testified.
Name an important opportunity you've had in your career and what you did with it?
I had the opportunity at trial to cross-examine a company branch director 20 years my senior, an individual from whom we needed to elicit a few discreet pieces of information key to damages and whose credibility was important to the jury relying on that information. Through my preparation and the experience of the cross-examination, I developed the understanding and the skill set to obtain the information I needed to get, maintain the witness's credibility and remain true to myself—I persisted in asking questions he had not quite answered; I impeached his testimony where necessary and re-crossed to correct misleading testimony opposing counsel elicited, all while remaining respectful and maintaining my own professionalism.
Who is the most important mentor you've had thus far in your career? Why?
As far as I can look back, I've really been graced with many great mentors who have given me their time and invested in me, whether it was a someone helping me navigate law school applications, advising me in law school or beyond. The lesson I've learned along the way was that, the more I engaged, the more the mentor gave me. As I've evolved in my career, my needs have changed and I've looked for and been fortunate to find many mentors at Farella, both partners and more senior associates, who model hard work and devotion to this job through their excellence and efficiency, balanced with time for family, friends and their own interests outside the law—their humanity.
What's the best part of working in the tech sector?
Stretching my brain, learning about new things all the time and working with really creative clients.
What's the biggest challenge?
Establishing trust with and earning respect from the client that I either already do or will come to understand and value the tech they are protecting as much as they want me to.
How do you describe what you do for a living to people you're meeting for the first time?
I help people protect the things they create.
What's one way technology has made your life easier?
The ability to check in remotely.
One way it's made your life more difficult?
The fact that none of us can hardly ever really be “unavailable” or fully offline.
What drew you to practicing law in the technology industry?
It's the dominant industry of the Bay Area and a sector that affords the opportunity to work with local clients big and small.
What's the best piece of career advice anyone ever gave you?
Never underestimate the importance of the people you work with—when you find good people, work hard to stick with them.
In 50 words or less, what's the best way to address tech's gender gap?
Don't spend years analyzing the numbers—acknowledge the gap, and do something, like start hiring more women.
Describe yourself in one word.
True to myself.
What kinds of new technologies should tomorrow's lawyers be able to use effectively?
Slack (or similar quick-contact platforms),
What's one area of technology that you're most excited about and why?
Gene therapies/any cancer-tracking and -defeating technology—because that is a truly meaningful technology that can change people's lives for the better, and because I wish it had been around when my dad was fighting the end of his cancer battle eight years ago.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow I Made Practice Group Chair: 'Think About Why You Want the Role, Because It Is Not an Easy Job,' Says Aaron Rubin of Morrison Foerster
Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
19 minute read'The Front Line of Regulating AI': Manatt's Brandon Reilly on CPPA's Move to Adopt New Data Broker and AI Rules
Litigation Leaders: Laura Hoey of Ropes & Gray on Bringing an Industry Focus to Litigation Matters
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250