Next Generation Women Leaders in Tech Law 2018: Julia Kropp, Farella Braun + Martel
Kropp says the best part of working in tech law is "stretching my brain, learning about new things all the time and working with really creative clients."
November 12, 2018 at 09:44 PM
4 minute read
Julia Kropp, an associate at Farella, took an active role for BladeRoom Group in trade secrets and intellectual property litigation over the design and construction of a $200 million Facebook data center in Sweden. At trial, she conducted the examination of one of the most senior Facebook employee who testified.
Name an important opportunity you've had in your career and what you did with it?
I had the opportunity at trial to cross-examine a company branch director 20 years my senior, an individual from whom we needed to elicit a few discreet pieces of information key to damages and whose credibility was important to the jury relying on that information. Through my preparation and the experience of the cross-examination, I developed the understanding and the skill set to obtain the information I needed to get, maintain the witness's credibility and remain true to myself—I persisted in asking questions he had not quite answered; I impeached his testimony where necessary and re-crossed to correct misleading testimony opposing counsel elicited, all while remaining respectful and maintaining my own professionalism.
Who is the most important mentor you've had thus far in your career? Why?
As far as I can look back, I've really been graced with many great mentors who have given me their time and invested in me, whether it was a someone helping me navigate law school applications, advising me in law school or beyond. The lesson I've learned along the way was that, the more I engaged, the more the mentor gave me. As I've evolved in my career, my needs have changed and I've looked for and been fortunate to find many mentors at Farella, both partners and more senior associates, who model hard work and devotion to this job through their excellence and efficiency, balanced with time for family, friends and their own interests outside the law—their humanity.
What's the best part of working in the tech sector?
Stretching my brain, learning about new things all the time and working with really creative clients.
What's the biggest challenge?
Establishing trust with and earning respect from the client that I either already do or will come to understand and value the tech they are protecting as much as they want me to.
How do you describe what you do for a living to people you're meeting for the first time?
I help people protect the things they create.
What's one way technology has made your life easier?
The ability to check in remotely.
One way it's made your life more difficult?
The fact that none of us can hardly ever really be “unavailable” or fully offline.
What drew you to practicing law in the technology industry?
It's the dominant industry of the Bay Area and a sector that affords the opportunity to work with local clients big and small.
What's the best piece of career advice anyone ever gave you?
Never underestimate the importance of the people you work with—when you find good people, work hard to stick with them.
In 50 words or less, what's the best way to address tech's gender gap?
Don't spend years analyzing the numbers—acknowledge the gap, and do something, like start hiring more women.
Describe yourself in one word.
True to myself.
What kinds of new technologies should tomorrow's lawyers be able to use effectively?
Slack (or similar quick-contact platforms),
What's one area of technology that you're most excited about and why?
Gene therapies/any cancer-tracking and -defeating technology—because that is a truly meaningful technology that can change people's lives for the better, and because I wish it had been around when my dad was fighting the end of his cancer battle eight years ago.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: Jeffrey Kessler and Steve Berman Reach a Settlement With the NCAA that Reshapes College Sports
Litigators of the Week: Robbins Geller Lands $490M Securities Settlement in Case Over Apple's Prospects in China
'Disclose, Disclose, Disclose': A Conversation With Stradley Ronon's David Piper on the Rise of CIPA Claims
Where Privacy Laws and Litigation Trends Collide: A Conversation With Covington & Burling's Lindsey Tonsager and Kate Cahoy
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 3GlaxoSmithKline Settles Most Zantac Lawsuits for $2.2B
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5Monsanto Moves to Pause PCB Trial That Starts This Week
Who Got The Work
Blank Rome partner Andrew T. Hambelton has stepped in to defend Fragrancenet.com in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Aug. 29 in New York Southern District Court by the Blakely Law Group, targets the defendants for allegedly selling counterfeit fragrance products. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Lorna G. Schofield, is 1:24-cv-06521, Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co. v. Quester (US) Enterprises, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Davis Polk & Wardwell partners Mari Grace and Edmund Polubinski III have entered appearances for Australia-based Bitcoin-mining company Iris Energy and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Eastern District Court by the Rosen Law Firm, contends that the defendants concealed the inadequacy of the company's site in Childress County, Texas, including it being 'ill-equipped' and unable to operate the company's proprietary design. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Peggy Kuo, is 1:24-cv-07046, Williams-Israel v. Iris Energy Limited et al.
Who Got The Work
Ryan S. Stippich of Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren has entered an appearance for biopharmaceutical company Veru Inc. and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Sept. 30 in Wisconsin Western District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of June Ovadias, accuses the defendant of failing to disclose that small sample sizes and other issues rendered it unlikely that the FDA would grant Emergency Use Authorization for the cancer drug candidate sabizabulin as a potential treatment for COVID-19. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge William M. Conley, is 3:24-cv-00676, Ovadias, June v. Steiner, Mitchell et al.
Who Got The Work
Holland & Knight partners Cynthia A. Gierhart and Thomas Willcox Brooke have entered appearances for Pakistani American Political Action Committee and Rao Kamran Ali in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The action, filed Sept. 24 in District of Columbia District Court by Jackson Walker on behalf of Pakistani American Public Affairs Committee, accuses the defendants of using a mark that's confusingly similar to the plaintiff's 'Pak-Pac' marks without authorization. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Randolph D. Moss, is 1:24-cv-02727, Pakistani American Public Affairs Committee v. Pakistani American Political Action Committee et al.
Who Got The Work
Lauren M. Rosenberg and Yonatan Even of Cravath, Swaine & Moore have stepped in to represent Israel-based Oddity Tech Ltd. in a pending securities class action. The case, filed Aug. 30 in New York Southern District Court by Pomerantz LLP and Holzer & Holzer, contends that the defendant made materially misleading statements regarding the capability of Oddity's AI technology and ongoing civil litigation, resulting in the artifical inflation of the market price of Oddity's securities. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Margaret M. Garnett, is 1:24-cv-06571, Hoare v. Oddity Tech Ltd. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250