Next Generation Women Leaders in Tech Law 2018: Sara Giardina, Lyft Inc.
"I loved (and still love) the idea of working in an industry that directly affects the lives of the everyday person," says Giardina, who is senior counsel, litigation at Lyft. "Technology is shaping humanity, and it's a privilege for all of us to be part of that."
November 12, 2018 at 04:35 PM
4 minute read
Sara Giardina, who is senior counsel, litigation at Lyft, has served as the company's principle IP litigation adviser for the past three years and has been the lead litigator on a wide variety of complex litigation matters including Telephone Consumer Protection Act, Fair Credit Reporting Act, patent infringement, and worker misclassification matters. Additionally, she's been the architect of Lyft's Law Enforcement Request team, which was created to partner with and assist federal, state and local law enforcement.
What kinds of new technologies should tomorrow's lawyers be able to use effectively?
Lawyers should be taking advantage of all the tools available today that encourage communication and information sharing. There are a lot of incredible lawyers out there. Go learn from them.
What's one area of technology that you're most excited about and why?
Definitely autonomous vehicles. Other recent advancements in transportation technology have been life-changing, and I can't wait to see how the next innovations in transportation continue to improve the environment and accessibility for all.
Who is the most important mentor you've had thus far in your career? Why?
Lyft's head of litigation. She has a personality and working style that is similar to mine in many ways, and I think those similarities allow her to provide me guidance with empathy and kindness. She has not hesitated to express vulnerability and communicate her personal experience in ways that I can directly apply to my own career trajectory.
What's the best part of working in the tech sector?
I love the pace of the work, and that there is always a new challenge. We are lucky to work in an industry where the opportunities to learn and grow are never-ending, and we are surrounded by brilliant people from whom we can learn an enormous amount.
What's the biggest challenge?
We don't always have all the resources we might like, and it can be uncomfortable at times to not have the resources to deliver a “perfect” result. Over time, it becomes easier to assess what work truly does need to be fully resourced and which work can be handled adequately with what we have immediately at our disposal.
How do you describe what you do for a living to people you're meeting for the first time?
I work to solve Lyft's problems, legal or otherwise.
What's one way technology has made your life easier?
Ride-sharing! It's hard to even remember what my life was like without ride-sharing, even though it wasn't very long ago. It has truly changed how I function on a daily basis.
Name an important opportunity you've had in your career and what you did with it.
The first time I gave an oral argument in federal court, I was asked by the partner to handle the argument on about 18 hours notice. I wasn't sure if I was prepared to handle such a big responsibility under such a short time frame and considered declining, but I decided that I should seize the opportunity. The experience increased my confidence, and it showed me what I am capable of when given the opportunity.
What drew you to practicing law in the technology industry?
I loved (and still love) the idea of working in an industry that directly affects the lives of the everyday person. Technology is shaping humanity, and it's a privilege for all of us to be part of that.
What's the best piece of career advice anyone ever gave you?
Say yes to opportunities, even if it scares you, and even if it feels like it's outside the scope of “your job.” If you take on projects that push you outside your comfort zone, no matter the outcome, you will grow from those experiences. If you agree to work on something that is outside the scope of your expertise or your typical role, then you have an opportunity to not only grow as a person and lawyer, but also establish a reputation for yourself as someone who rises to the challenge.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigation Leaders: Laura Hoey of Ropes & Gray on Bringing an Industry Focus to Litigation Matters
Litigators of the Week: A $604.9M Trade Secrets Verdict With a Big Assist From a Juror Question
Litigation Leaders: Quinn Emanuel's Michael Carlinsky on Training Associates to Think and Act Like Trial Lawyers
Litigators of the Week: Jeffrey Kessler and Steve Berman Reach a Settlement With the NCAA that Reshapes College Sports
Trending Stories
- 1Big Law Expected To Follow Milbank's Lead With Associate Year-End Bonuses
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-58
- 3Sweet James Clinches $17.4M Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California's Kings County
- 4In Lame-Duck Session, US Senate Confirms Illinois Federal Judge on Bipartisan Vote
- 5Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250