Next Generation Women Leaders in Tech Law 2018: Sara Pollock, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
"As a litigator, I'm in the business of resolving disputes—bloodlessly where possible," says the Quinn Emanuel associate.
November 12, 2018 at 09:34 PM
3 minute read
Parachuting into a yearslong, multijurisdictional trade secret case as replacement counsel, Sara Pollock helped a Fortune 100 client escape for a tiny fraction of claimed damages before plaintiffs deposed a single employee.
Who is the most important mentor you've had thus far in your career?
Justice Kathryn M. Werdegar, retired, California Supreme Court
What drew you to practicing law in the technology industry?
The fast pace of product development and innovation in tech and the inveterate optimism of the people, who are following their passion.
What's the best part of working in the tech sector?
Tech is an incredibly exciting area in which to practice. It is transforming the way we live, work and interact with one another, and I enjoy playing my small role.
What's the biggest challenge?
Technology tends to change and develop much faster than the law, so yesterday's laws are often ill-suited for my clients' current issues.
How do you describe what you do for a living to people you're meeting for the first time?
As a litigator, I'm in the business of resolving disputes—bloodlessly where possible.
What's one way technology has made your life easier?
By embracing new technologies, we can achieve greater efficiency in almost every aspect of our lives. To take only one example, my law school class was the last to learn how to Shepardize cases using both books and online tools. I can say without the slightest hesitation that technology has made legal research exponentially easier, as well as more accurate and comprehensive.
One way it's made your life more difficult?
I'm not always ready for a selfie.
What's the best piece of career advice anyone ever gave you?
“Life is long.” In other words, you have time for multiple iterations.
In 50 words or less, what's the best way to address tech's gender gap?
Unfortunately, I don't have a 50-word solution. But the visibility of women in the industry, and in leadership roles, cannot be underestimated. It's also important to start early by encouraging participation in and access to STEM education, while also emphasizing that the tech industry is far more than just math and coding—there is room for all creative types.
Describe yourself in one word.
Dedicated.
What kinds of new technologies should tomorrow's lawyers be able to use effectively?
All of them! You can't explain the ins and outs of new technology to a judge or jury if you aren't able to use it yourself.
What's one area of technology that you're most excited about and why?
Autonomous cars. Traffic on the 101!
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAttorney of the Year Finalist: Michael Rubin, Latham & Watkins
Quinn Emanuel Staves Off Meta's Attempt to Stop £3.1B Collective Action
2 minute readJoseph Saveri Law Firm, Co-Counsel File 9th Circuit Appeal in Lawsuit Targeting GitHub's Use of Code to Train AI Models
'Effective Remedy'?: DOJ Unveils Corrective Action Plan in Google Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 3GlaxoSmithKline Settles Most Zantac Lawsuits for $2.2B
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5Monsanto Moves to Pause PCB Trial That Starts This Week
Who Got The Work
Blank Rome partner Andrew T. Hambelton has stepped in to defend Fragrancenet.com in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Aug. 29 in New York Southern District Court by the Blakely Law Group, targets the defendants for allegedly selling counterfeit fragrance products. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Lorna G. Schofield, is 1:24-cv-06521, Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co. v. Quester (US) Enterprises, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Davis Polk & Wardwell partners Mari Grace and Edmund Polubinski III have entered appearances for Australia-based Bitcoin-mining company Iris Energy and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Eastern District Court by the Rosen Law Firm, contends that the defendants concealed the inadequacy of the company's site in Childress County, Texas, including it being 'ill-equipped' and unable to operate the company's proprietary design. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Peggy Kuo, is 1:24-cv-07046, Williams-Israel v. Iris Energy Limited et al.
Who Got The Work
Ryan S. Stippich of Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren has entered an appearance for biopharmaceutical company Veru Inc. and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Sept. 30 in Wisconsin Western District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of June Ovadias, accuses the defendant of failing to disclose that small sample sizes and other issues rendered it unlikely that the FDA would grant Emergency Use Authorization for the cancer drug candidate sabizabulin as a potential treatment for COVID-19. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge William M. Conley, is 3:24-cv-00676, Ovadias, June v. Steiner, Mitchell et al.
Who Got The Work
Holland & Knight partners Cynthia A. Gierhart and Thomas Willcox Brooke have entered appearances for Pakistani American Political Action Committee and Rao Kamran Ali in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The action, filed Sept. 24 in District of Columbia District Court by Jackson Walker on behalf of Pakistani American Public Affairs Committee, accuses the defendants of using a mark that's confusingly similar to the plaintiff's 'Pak-Pac' marks without authorization. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Randolph D. Moss, is 1:24-cv-02727, Pakistani American Public Affairs Committee v. Pakistani American Political Action Committee et al.
Who Got The Work
Lauren M. Rosenberg and Yonatan Even of Cravath, Swaine & Moore have stepped in to represent Israel-based Oddity Tech Ltd. in a pending securities class action. The case, filed Aug. 30 in New York Southern District Court by Pomerantz LLP and Holzer & Holzer, contends that the defendant made materially misleading statements regarding the capability of Oddity's AI technology and ongoing civil litigation, resulting in the artifical inflation of the market price of Oddity's securities. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Margaret M. Garnett, is 1:24-cv-06571, Hoare v. Oddity Tech Ltd. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250