Women Leaders in Tech Law 2018: Stephanie Skaff, Farella Braun + Martel
"The gender gap is alive and well, unfortunately," Skaff says. "Women are still underrepresented in technology and will continue to be underrepresented until we find more creative solutions to some existing problems."
November 12, 2018 at 07:25 PM
4 minute read
In trade secrets and intellectual property litigation over the design and construction of a $200 million Facebook data center in Sweden, Stephanie Skaff helped net a confidential settlement with Facebook for her client BladeRoom Group Ltd. Following a 20-day trial against co-defendant Emerson Electric Co., a jury awarded BladeRoom a $30 million judgment in May.
Name a lawyer whose work you admire and why.
Annette Hurst. Annette is whip-smart and fearless. She not only has a commanding presence in the courtroom, she also finds time to use her talents to contribute to the nonprofit legal community and to the national debate on important social and political issues.
What's the best part about working in the tech sector?
Everything changes rapidly, so I'm always learning something new.
What's the biggest challenge?
Everything changes rapidly, so I'm always learning something new.
What piece of advice do you give to lawyers considering a career in tech law?
Don't just represent your clients … partner with them. Tap into their expertise and resources, collaborate together, and develop trusted relationships. Forging real partnerships with your clients will not only make your work more satisfying and fun, it will bring you better results than you can ever achieve on your own.
What's one way technology has made your life easier?
I can work from anywhere in the world.
One way it's made your life more difficult?
Technology definitely has changed the pace of the profession and made carving out family and personal time more challenging.
Name an important opportunity you got early in your career and what you did with it.
My first day at Farella, I was staffed on a case that was starting a jury trial. I ended up being tasked with reviewing the daily transcripts for possible post-trial legal motions. I found several creative legal issues and ended up writing a winning judgement notwithstanding verdict. A fortunate (and very fun) start to a long career!
What's the best piece of career advice anyone ever gave you?
Judges are people. Clients are people. Witnesses are people. Your colleagues are people. And even those frustrating lawyers on the other side of the case are people. The better you understand, communicate and work with people, the better trial lawyer you will be.
Number one survival tip in a work crisis:
Breathe and keep things in perspective.
In 50 words or less, how far has the tech industry gone toward tackling its gender gap since you started practicing?
The gender gap is alive and well, unfortunately. Women are still underrepresented in technology and will continue to be underrepresented until we find more creative solutions to some existing problems, including the lack of a robust pipeline of female STEM students and a work environment that continues to erect significant barriers to career advancement for women.
What's one way you've had to change your thinking toward practicing law to succeed with tech industry clients?
I no longer think of myself as just a litigator or a trial lawyer; I think of myself as a trusted partner to my clients. I know my clients are looking for the quickest, most creative and cost- effective solution to their existing disputes. Finding that solution requires understanding the client's business and key objectives really well. Asking the right questions and listening carefully from the beginning of an engagement is critical.
What's one area of technology that you're most excited about and why?
The rapid developments in artificial intelligence are exciting not only from a technology perspective, but it also because AI doesn't fit neatly into the traditional confines of our existing intellectual property laws. AI will require a re-examination of the very foundation of how we define and own intellectual property. (e.g. If an invention is created by a machine, is it patentable? If code is written by a machine, who is the author?)
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow the Deal Got Done: Sidley Austin and NWSL Angel City Football Club/Iger
How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'Think About Why You Want the Role, Because It Is Not an Easy Job,' Says Aaron Rubin of Morrison Foerster
Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
19 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250