Next-Generation Women Leaders in Tech Law 2018: Rose Leda Ehler, Munger, Tolles & Olson
Less than six years out of law school, Ehler played a primary role in winning a preliminary injunction against streaming service VidAngel on behalf of Hollywood studios.
November 13, 2018 at 11:00 AM
4 minute read
Less than six years out of law school, Rosa Leda Ehler played a primary role in winning a preliminary injunction against streaming service VidAngel on behalf of Hollywood studios Disney, Fox and Warner Brothers. Ehler drafted key portions of the intellectual property motion taking aim at the service which claimed its technology immunized it from copyright infringement claims.
Who is the most important mentor you've had thus far in your career? Why?
I have been incredibly fortunate to have many great mentors. Among them, Carolyn Luedtke (a several-time named Women Leader in Tech Law) is my role model in how to be a great lawyer (not just a great woman lawyer), great colleague, and great all-around person outside of work.
What's the best part of working in the tech sector?
Learning about my clients' businesses and getting to play a small part in their enterprise. The technology sector is so creative and there are so many great ideas and products in development. As lawyers, we get to facilitate that innovation, even if we aren't doing the creating ourselves.
What's the biggest challenge?
The ever-changing nature of technology means that by the time you've mastered one aspect, it changes! That is also what makes it exciting and motivates me to stay engaged and help my clients look around corners in anticipation of whatever issue we need to tackle next.
How do you describe what you do for a living to people you're meeting for the first time?
I describe myself as a problem-solver. While I'm a litigator, at the end of the day, the solution for my clients might be outside the courtroom.
What's one way technology has made your life easier?
There are so many—I order my groceries online and they're delivered that night!
One way it's made your life more difficult?
I love technology a little too much. I need to be better at carving out tech-free times to maintain some semblance of balance and focus on my family.
Name an important opportunity you've had in your career and what you did with it?
I had the chance to be seconded in-house as product counsel at Square for four months in 2015. I learned as much as I possibly could from my mentors and colleagues at Square, both in terms of their view as in-house counsel and the perspective of a quickly growing tech company. I am now able to draw from that experience, as outside counsel to Square, but also to be a better lawyer for my other clients.
What drew you to practicing law in the technology industry?
The tech industry is rapidly evolving and that means lawyers need to figure out how to apply old legal concepts to new technology to best advise their clients. Copyright law is a great example. How do these old concepts from a predigital world apply to digital content? The legal issues in the technology are both fascinating and important.
What's the best piece of career advice anyone ever gave you?
Put yourself in your clients' shoes. As outside counsel, we can always be doing more to make our clients' lives a little easier.
In 50 words or less, what's the best way to address tech's gender gap?
Men need to care and be proactive too. I've been incredibly fortunate to have great male sponsors, including Kelly Klaus, who have encouraged me and helped me take next steps in my career. When everyone (men included) cares about the recruitment, retention, and promotion of women, we can make it happen.
What kinds of new technologies should tomorrow's lawyers be able to use effectively?
Lawyers to tech companies need to know the ins and outs of their client's tech. I keep as up-to-date as possible on my clients' tech products (and their competitors' products). That is the only way to truly understand their business and legal needs.
What's one area of technology that you're most excited about and why?
Working mostly in the consumer and entertainment technology space, I'm excited to see how connected home technology continues to expand and, on the entertainment side, how we engage with virtual-reality entertainment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The Front Line of Regulating AI': Manatt's Brandon Reilly on CPPA's Move to Adopt New Data Broker and AI Rules
Litigation Leaders: Laura Hoey of Ropes & Gray on Bringing an Industry Focus to Litigation Matters
Litigators of the Week: A $604.9M Trade Secrets Verdict With a Big Assist From a Juror Question
Litigation Leaders: Quinn Emanuel's Michael Carlinsky on Training Associates to Think and Act Like Trial Lawyers
Trending Stories
- 1Pharmaceutical Patents: Benefits and Challenges
- 2Where Do Web-Tracking Class Actions Belong? 8th Circuit Weighs the Issue
- 3While Data Breaches May Lead to Years of Legal Battles, Cyberattacks Can be Prevented
- 4The Definition of Special Employment
- 5People in the News—Nov. 21, 2024—Willig Williams, Hangley Aronchick
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250