Next-Generation Women Leaders in Tech Law 2018: Rose Leda Ehler, Munger, Tolles & Olson
Less than six years out of law school, Ehler played a primary role in winning a preliminary injunction against streaming service VidAngel on behalf of Hollywood studios.
November 13, 2018 at 11:00 AM
4 minute read
Less than six years out of law school, Rosa Leda Ehler played a primary role in winning a preliminary injunction against streaming service VidAngel on behalf of Hollywood studios Disney, Fox and Warner Brothers. Ehler drafted key portions of the intellectual property motion taking aim at the service which claimed its technology immunized it from copyright infringement claims.
Who is the most important mentor you've had thus far in your career? Why?
I have been incredibly fortunate to have many great mentors. Among them, Carolyn Luedtke (a several-time named Women Leader in Tech Law) is my role model in how to be a great lawyer (not just a great woman lawyer), great colleague, and great all-around person outside of work.
What's the best part of working in the tech sector?
Learning about my clients' businesses and getting to play a small part in their enterprise. The technology sector is so creative and there are so many great ideas and products in development. As lawyers, we get to facilitate that innovation, even if we aren't doing the creating ourselves.
What's the biggest challenge?
The ever-changing nature of technology means that by the time you've mastered one aspect, it changes! That is also what makes it exciting and motivates me to stay engaged and help my clients look around corners in anticipation of whatever issue we need to tackle next.
How do you describe what you do for a living to people you're meeting for the first time?
I describe myself as a problem-solver. While I'm a litigator, at the end of the day, the solution for my clients might be outside the courtroom.
What's one way technology has made your life easier?
There are so many—I order my groceries online and they're delivered that night!
One way it's made your life more difficult?
I love technology a little too much. I need to be better at carving out tech-free times to maintain some semblance of balance and focus on my family.
Name an important opportunity you've had in your career and what you did with it?
I had the chance to be seconded in-house as product counsel at Square for four months in 2015. I learned as much as I possibly could from my mentors and colleagues at Square, both in terms of their view as in-house counsel and the perspective of a quickly growing tech company. I am now able to draw from that experience, as outside counsel to Square, but also to be a better lawyer for my other clients.
What drew you to practicing law in the technology industry?
The tech industry is rapidly evolving and that means lawyers need to figure out how to apply old legal concepts to new technology to best advise their clients. Copyright law is a great example. How do these old concepts from a predigital world apply to digital content? The legal issues in the technology are both fascinating and important.
What's the best piece of career advice anyone ever gave you?
Put yourself in your clients' shoes. As outside counsel, we can always be doing more to make our clients' lives a little easier.
In 50 words or less, what's the best way to address tech's gender gap?
Men need to care and be proactive too. I've been incredibly fortunate to have great male sponsors, including Kelly Klaus, who have encouraged me and helped me take next steps in my career. When everyone (men included) cares about the recruitment, retention, and promotion of women, we can make it happen.
What kinds of new technologies should tomorrow's lawyers be able to use effectively?
Lawyers to tech companies need to know the ins and outs of their client's tech. I keep as up-to-date as possible on my clients' tech products (and their competitors' products). That is the only way to truly understand their business and legal needs.
What's one area of technology that you're most excited about and why?
Working mostly in the consumer and entertainment technology space, I'm excited to see how connected home technology continues to expand and, on the entertainment side, how we engage with virtual-reality entertainment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Stay Focused on Building Strong Relationships,' Says Joseph Yaffe of Skadden
US Patent Innovators Can Look to International Trade Commission Enforcement for Protection, IP Lawyers Say
How the Deal Got Done: Sidley Austin and NWSL Angel City Football Club/Iger
How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
Trending Stories
- 1SDNY Criminal Division Deputy Chief Returns to Debevoise
- 2Brownstein Adds Former Interior Secretary, Offering 'Strategic Counsel' During New Trump Term
- 3Tragedy on I-95: Florida Lawsuit Against Horizon Freight System Could Set New Precedent in Crash Cases
- 4Weil, Loading Up on More Regulatory Talent, Adds SEC Asset Management Co-Chief
- 5Big Banks Did Great Last Year. What Does That Mean for Big Law?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250