Build or Buy? Orrick Plans to Do Both by Investing in Legal Tech Startups
Orrick plans to invest up to $250,000 in legal tech start-ups which are getting larger rounds of funding from VC firms.
November 15, 2018 at 05:58 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe's partners aren't strangers to investing in startups. The San Francisco-founded firm has a fund that has invested in tech ventures for roughly three decades.
The firm is now planning to go further by investing specifically in legal technology startups, as part of a multipronged effort to keep on the cutting edge of changes to its own industry. The firm last year launched an internal software development team, Orrick Labs, that is designing its own tech solutions for the firm.
Orrick is set to announce on Thursday that it plans to invest up to $250,000 in legal tech startups that are receiving bigger rounds of funding from major venture capital firms. The firm anticipates making about two such investments a year that will also allow the firm's lawyers to beta test promising new software.
Other firms, including Dentons' Nextlaw Ventures and Baker McKenzie, have also begun investing in legal tech startups. Foley & Lardner and Allen & Overy are among firms that have developed incubators that give space and some legal advice to young companies.
Don Keller, a partner in Orrick's Silicon Valley office who leads its technology practice, said the firm is launching its investment program as a way to augment its own development of legal software. But the firm decided to limit its investments to $250,000—already more than the $50,000 or $100,000 investments it makes in other tech startups—because it doesn't want to be the main source of funding for young companies.
“I think the interesting question for us, ultimately, is how big of an Orrick Labs organization do we build internally?” Keller said. “Because at the end of the day, we're not a software company. That's not our expertise. There is a certain amount we want to do of that because we're not finding it in the market.”
Keller said there is a more compelling case for investing in legal tech companies as the market matures and as law firms become more sophisticated users of technology. One potential driver of legal tech adoption, Keller said, will be the ability of law firms to pass on the cost of technology to clients.
For instance, Orrick is rolling out a new, cloud-based version of a “data site” platform that lets clients access documents. About 1,000 clients currently have access to their own data site, Keller said. The cost of the cloud-based service, which is isolated for individual clients, may be able to be passed on. As more cloud-based services are priced in that way, Keller said firms will be more willing to invest in them.
“That opening is extremely significant to the development of this legal tech market, actually,” Keller said.
While the firm has already decided to be a legal tech investor, Keller said it may eventually be a seller of products as well. That would stem from products being developed by its Orrick Labs group, which could eventually develop into a spun-off software development business. That is an approach being mulled by Chapman and Cutler after the firm last week sold an internally developed software application to Net Documents.
“You get the best of both worlds,” Keller said. “You get access to [the products] and you get more developers. We have a team of developers, but we don't have 100. And we don't want 100. But if you spun it out, you could have 100.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCleary Nabs Public Company Advisory Practice Head From Orrick in San Francisco
Morgan Lewis Shutters Shenzhen Office Less Than Two Years After Launch
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250