SEC Thumps Two ICOs for Failing to Register as Securities Offerings
Two SEC orders issued Friday impose $250,000 penalties against ICO issuers AirFox and Paragon Coin, force them to register the offerings as securities, and include requirements to compensate investors harmed by purchasing tokens in the unlawful offerings.
November 16, 2018 at 02:26 PM
6 minute read
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has handed down its first civil penalties to the issuers of initial coin offerings, solely for failing to register as securities in a pair of settlements announced Friday.
In two separate orders, the SEC imposed $250,000 penalties against ICO issuers CarrierEQ, Inc., which does business as Airfox Inc, and Paragon Coin. The orders also force the companies to register their respective offerings, make all associated filings, and require them to compensate investors harmed by purchasing tokens in the unlawful offerings. As is custom in most SEC matters, the companies neither confirmed nor denied the SEC's allegations against them as part of the settlement.
AirFox is represented by Michael Hines in the Boston office of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom. Paragon is represented by a team at Schulte Roth & Zabel.
Asked for impressions of the two settlements, lawyers who advise cryptocurrency companies said that the deals could be a roadmap for other CEOs to fall in line with the SEC's interpretation of the federal securities laws. Schulte's Howard Schiffman said in a brief phone interview that the Paragon deal was “a significant matter, which we think lays the legitimate path for ICO registration going forward.”
John Paul “JP” Schnapper-Casteras of Schnapper-Casteras PLLC, who wasn't involved in either case that settled Friday, said that the settlements mark the first time that the SEC has put non-fraudulent ICO issuers under the microscope and appear to be “part of a broader, accelerating enforcement climate by the SEC that's been steadily chugging along for some time.”
“'If you're a new, domestic ICO in the United States, you're on notice a couple of times over to look over these issues and hire a lawyer,” he said.
According to the SEC, AirFox is a Massachusetts-based company that allows prepaid mobile users to earn free or discounted service by interacting with advertisements on their smartphones. The SEC claims that between August and October 2017, AirFox offered and eventually sold digital “AirTokens” issued on the Ethereum blockchain, raising about $15 million in capital to fund a new, international business and ecosystem. The SEC says AirFox told investors they would be able to buy and sell things other than mobile data over the platform.
“In connection with the offering, AirFox stated that AirTokens would increase in value as a result of AirFox's efforts, and that AirFox would undertake efforts to provide investors with liquidity by making AirTokens tradeable on secondary markets,” says the SEC order. “A purchaser in the offering of AirTokens would have had a reasonable expectation of obtaining a future profit based upon AirFox's efforts, including AirFox revising its app, creating an 'ecosystem,' and adding new functionality using the proceeds from the sale of AirTokens.”
According to the SEC, the AirToken launch violated Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 by offering securities without having a registration statement on file—or qualifying for exemption from registration.
An outside spokeswoman for AirFox said as one of the first corporations to settle with the SEC, the company “expects to continue growing its blockchain platform within a regulatory framework.”
“Our team continues to forge ahead on our mission to democratize financial services for the billions of unbanked in emerging markets,” she said.
According to the SEC, Paragon is a web-based company that sought to implement blockchain technology to help bolster the growing cannabis industry. The SEC says that from August through October 2017, Paragon offered its PRG tokens on the Ethereum blockchain and raised about $12 million in digital assets via the offering.
“In connection with the offering, Paragon described the way in which PRG tokens would increase in value as a result of Paragon's efforts and stated that PRG tokens would be traded on secondary markets,” says the SEC order. As in the AirToken case, the SEC found that the PRG offering violated Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act.
In a press release announcing the settlement, Paragon CEO Jessica VerSteeg said the company had worked on the deal for a year.
“Paragon is making history!” she said. “This resolution with the SEC gives Paragon the path forward to full compliance with the U.S. securities laws and clears the way for Paragon to pursue its vision of bringing transparency and accountability to the cannabis industry through blockchain technology.”
In a press statement announcing the two settlements, Stephanie Avakian, the co-director of the SEC's Enforcement Division said that that the agency has made it clear that ICO issuers must abide by existing regulations.
“These cases tell those who are considering taking similar actions that we continue to be on the lookout for violations of the federal securities laws with respect to digital assets,” she said.
Her co-director, Steven Peikin added: “By providing investors who purchased securities in these ICOs with the opportunity to be reimbursed and having the issuers register their tokens with the SEC, these orders provide a model for companies that have issued tokens in ICOs and seek to comply with the federal securities laws.”
The investigation into Paragon was conducted by Pamela Sawhney of the Enforcement Division's Cyber Unit and was supervised by Cyber Unit Chief Robert Cohen. The investigation into AirFox was conducted by Colin Forbes, Emily Holness, and Michael Vito and supervised by Celia Moore, Amy Gwiazda, and John Dugan, all of the SEC's Boston Regional Office.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
Democratic State AGs Revel in Role as Last Line of Defense Against Trump Agenda
7 minute readPa. Judicial Nominee Advances While Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden Picks
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250