Bedsworth: Symbols of Authority
It would be poor form, indeed, to start your judicial career by violating the Government Code by failing to wear a robe during court proceedings. A gavel, however, has all the utility of an inflatable dartboard.
November 21, 2018 at 07:45 PM
7 minute read
“Don't judge me. You wanna judge me, put on a black gown and get a gavel. Get in line with the rest of them that's about to judge me.” — Lil Wayne
As the above quote from noted legal philosopher, sharp dresser, and Grammy award-winning rapper Wayne Michael Carter Jr. explains, judges are provided two symbols of authority: a robe and a gavel.
Actually, “provided” is a poor choice of words.[1] No one provided them to us. We had to buy them.
Which means we had to choose them. The first decisions a judge makes have nothing to do with CCP §437c or the hearsay rule. They are best summed up as “Bell sleeves or straight?” “Zipper or snaps?”
And, of course, the biggest call you make in the first few days after your appointment (or election in my case[2]) is, “What in hell is the difference between the $79.95 robe and the $499.95 robe?”
But you gotta have one. It's de rigeur. I mean, there are conventions that apply to every occupation. You wanna sing Haggard … you gotta have scuffed-up boots. You wanna play in the NBA … you gotta have $1,200 customized high-tops. You wanna rule on SLAPP motions … get yourself a robe.[3]
The better reason for getting a robe is that it's statutorily required. Government Code §68110 provides: “Every judge of a court of this state shall, in open court during the presentation of causes before him or her, wear a judicial robe, which the judge shall furnish at his or her own expense. The Judicial Council shall, by rule, prescribe the style of such robes.”[4]
Quite apart from convention, it would be poor form, indeed, to start your judicial career by violating the Government Code.
But the best reason for a robe was explained to me by the Rev. R. A. Taylor, S.J., when I was in college.[5] As he put it, “It's hard to argue with people in black robes. Has been since The Inquisition. That's why judges and Jesuits never speak without one.”
So there are at least three good reasons—quite apart from my waistline—for me to go into court every day in Johnny Cash's muumuu.
But the gavel is another thing entirely. A gavel has all the utility of an inflatable dartboard.
Auctioneers use them, legislators use them (both to announce the conclusion of a bit of business), but in 47 years of practice, I don't recall ever seeing another judge use one. I've been on the bench for 32 years,[6] and I've had more use for kudzu and cane toads than I have for a gavel.
In fact, the one time—that's ONCE in 32 years—the one time I used one, it was counterproductive, bordering on catastrophic.
I was presiding over a gang murder and had members of both gangs mad-dogging each other from opposite sides of the courtroom. One afternoon, two of the gang-bangers got into a shouting match and immediately jumped into the aisle to escalate their disagreement to shoving and chest-bumping.
My bailiff started up the aisle to break it up. I, highly-trained bench officer that I am, was unable to think of anything to do except yell.
“Hey,” I shouted. “Hey. Hey.”[7]
But then, highly-trained bench officer that I am, I remembered. “I have a gavel.”
And sure enough, there it sat. Right next to my water pitcher. Right where it had sat—untouched except for dusting—ever since my children presented it to me at my swearing-in ceremony seven years earlier.
I grabbed it,[8] and began banging on the bench.
My bailiff, startled by a sudden unexpected—indeed unprecedented—“Bang, bang, bang,”[9] behind him, and momentarily distracted from the bangers in front of him, spun around toward me to see what all the noise was.
The jurors, having no experience with gunshots and already nervous about the subject matter of the case and the appearance of the spectators in the gallery, thought someone was shooting, and several of them dropped to the floor. Someone screamed.
Two gang-bangers—coming to the same conclusion: that somebody was shooting—bolted out the back door of the courtroom into the hallway.
In the hallway, three uniformed police officers were waiting to testify. Hearing shouting and banging noises and seeing two gang members bursting through the doors, two of them scooped up the gangsters, and the third tried to control the goat rodeo that was now streaming out the courtroom doors behind them.
My bailiff, having separated the two instigators of this debacle, was trying to force them to sit down while all the other spectators were trying to jump up and leave.
As you can imagine, it took a while to put a tent over this circus. All in all, we probably lost a half-hour to a matter my bailiff could have sorted out in 10 seconds had it not been for the assistance of the highly-trained bench officer and his gavel.
His evaluation of my performance was very kind. As I recall, it went something like, “You were great, Judge … but I think next time you can just let me handle it while you keep an eye on the jurors.”[10]
My gavel now reposes—as it has since that day—in my office. It has not been used since. I do not conduct auctions in chambers, I do not legislate. And when I've had nails to pound, I've used a hockey puck.
The gavel's sole purpose now is to remind me of the smiles on Billy and Meggie's faces when they gave it to me.
Which, come to think of it, is plenty.
BEDS NOTES
[1] If I ever start writing a new column after “A Criminal Waste of Space,” it will be titled, “A Poor Choice of Words.” I'm all about truth in advertising.
[2] I was rejected by both parties for a municipal court appointment. Jerry Brown thought I was way too conservative and George Deukmejian thought I was way too liberal. As Eisenhower famously said, “People who walk down the middle of the road get hit by trucks.”
[3] Or a straitjacket.
[4] That last sentence is the reason my robe is not a Sig Zane or a Reyn Spooner.
[5] Father Taylor taught my freshman English class out of Jim Murray's Pulitzer Prize-winning L.A. Times sports column. Blame him; nobody was more responsible for my writing style.
[6] Add a decade if you include my baseball career.
[7] This is what I yell at my cats when they get out of line—with roughly equal effect.
[8] Reverse interlocking grip.
[9] Having never used it, I had no idea what it would sound like and neither did he.
[10] Unspoken sub-text: “Or play the flute, light a fire, knit a pair of socks … anything that doesn't involve 'helping'.”
William W. Bedsworth is an Associate Justice of the California Court of Appeal. He writes this column to get it out of his system. He can be contacted at [email protected]. And look for his latest book, Lawyers, Gubs, and Monkeys, through Amazon, Barnes and Noble, and Vandeplas Publishing.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSaying Your Goodbyes—Ethical Obligations When Transitioning to a New Firm
5 minute readLost in the Legal Maze: How State Regulations Are Hindering Hemp Operators' Success
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250