How to Negotiate the Offer You Want
The road to the offer stage in an interview process is usually a long and winding one with a few bumps along the way.
November 25, 2018 at 12:00 AM
5 minute read
The Question: What offer terms can I negotiate for an in-house position? What are the dos and don't for getting what I want? How do I figure out where there is room to negotiate?
The road to the offer stage in an interview process is usually a long and winding one with a few bumps along the way. Once this destination is reached, a candidate may anticipate a deep breath, but for many, the thought of negotiating the offer creates added stress. What should I ask for? How do I know what areas have room for more? How do I ask for more without appearing greedy? How do I behave appropriately so my offer does not get pulled? These are the most common questions candidates ask themselves when contemplating a negotiation. Regarding your specific questions:
How do I figure out where there might be room to negotiate and what truly is set in stone?
Every employer is different with regard to its compensation and benefits policies—and every hiring manager is different with regard to how s/he approaches an offer. Some lay it all out on the table, some lowball, and some allow a little give in one or more areas. So no two employers are the same. Consequently, you are never going to know where there will be room …unless you ask. But before you do, I recommend prioritizing the offer elements about which you care most and focus on those as part of your negotiation conversation. An across the board request for more would likely compromise your credibility and could be perceived negatively. So targeting your ask as well as communicating a grateful, humble inquiry is key to determining which levers can truly be pulled.
What offer terms are acceptable to negotiate?
A typical offer of employment for an in-house position includes the following:
- A base salary
- Target bonus
- Stock grant
- “Benefits” (medical, dental, vision, investment vehicles, vacation days); and
- In some instances, a signing bonus
Generally speaking, it is acceptable to negotiate base salary and the number of shares you have been offered in a stock grant. However, the vesting schedule for stock is set as policy so you won't make headway asking for a change in this area. The target bonus is typically locked in, but I'm seeing more companies articulating a bonus range at the beginning of an interview process (i.e., “10 to 15 percent” or “15 to 20 percent”). So if you feel that the bonus is low for your qualifications, by all means ask whether the employer has any flexibility in this area. Another acceptable term to negotiate is a signing bonus. If there is a gap in your current compensation and the offer, a signing bonus is a popular avenue to help bridge that gap, especially if the employer has no room to increase the base salary. If a signing bonus is part of the original offer, asking for a higher payout can be acceptable in certain circumstances—but not advisable in others (i.e., initial signing bonus is huge, after negotiation employer states that offer is final etc.)
The benefits component is what it is and is generally nonnegotiable. However, if you need flexibility on vacation days—and this is a priority—it is appropriate to discuss your situation with your future boss to manage expectations and determine whether there can be an informal accommodation once you join the company.
Once you determine what you'd like to negotiate, you will need to turn your attention next to the “how”—as it is crucial to ensure your messaging and tone are appropriate. Take the time to capture your thoughts on paper and practice until you feel at ease with how you will communicate your asks. A snapshot of dos and don'ts:
Do:
- Express appreciation for the offer you have received
- Be enthusiastic about the opportunity
- Use phrases that inquire about an employer's flexibility around the elements of the offer you'd like revised
- Create a humble and gracious tone
- Be clear about what you are asking for
- Be concise
- Have reasons that would support your request for “more”
Don't
- Don't express a tone of entitlement
- Don't make demands
- Don't contradict what you agreed to earlier in the process
- Don't lie to get what you want
- Don't blather on and on
- Don't over-share
Negotiating an offer can be stressful—particularly if you feel you are in unfamiliar territory in such a dynamic. Understanding which terms are more often negotiated will assist in building confidence and a strategy. But each employer is unique so knowing where the lines are will only be had if you ask. So know what terms hold priority for you and communicate a clear and gracious message when asking for what you want. In some instances you'll get more, in others you won't. Regardless, you will complete the process feeling good about your final effort and build the confidence for the next “ask” in your career.
Julie Q. Brush is the founder and author of The Lawyer Whisperer(www.thelawyerwhisperer.com), a career advice column for legal professionals, also found on LinkedIn. She is co-founder of Solutus Legal Search, a legal search/consulting boutique firm, serving as a strategic adviser to lawyers, law firms and corporations.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBuild It and They Will Come: Tips to Market Your Practice as a Junior Attorney
6 minute readYelp Sues Google for Alleged Antitrust Violations, Citing Previous 'Watershed' Government Ruling
There's Something in the Water: San Diego Is Once Again a Hot Market for National Law Firms
6 minute readWhat Happens When You Go Viral? How a Law Firm Associate Manages Her Social Media Success
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250