Morrison & Foerster, Ashby Recover $31M in Universities' Royalty Spat
The University of Wisconsin allocated Washington University 1 percent of a royalty stream on a kidney treatment the two schools patented. Apparently the figure should have been closer to 30 percent.
November 28, 2018 at 08:14 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Business Court Insider
Morrison & Foerster and Ashby & Geddes have engineered a nifty turnaround for Washington University in St. Louis in a licensing dispute with the University of Wisconsin.
Three years ago a Delaware federal judge had closed the courthouse doors on Washington University, saying it waited too long to demand a greater share of royalties on a pharmaceutical patent developed jointly by researchers at the two schools.
Washington University got that decision reversed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit last year, and secured a $31 million judgment Monday following a March bench trial. That's about 30 times the 1 percent share of royalties the University of Wisconsin's tech transfer unit, known as WARF, had been sharing on a patent that supports AbbVie Inc.'s kidney treatment Zemplar.
“We are pleased with the court's ruling,” a spokeswoman for the university said in a written statement. “In awarding Washington University over $31 million, the court recognized WARF's failure to properly value the co-owned patent and the contributions of Washington University's researcher, and to share critical information with Washington University.”
U.S. District Judge Joseph Bataillon, who took over the case from now-retired Judge Gregory Sleet earlier this year, issued his opinion under seal because of confidential information in the licensing agreements. Bataillon is a Nebraska judge who has pitched in to help the District of Delaware with its ballooning caseload.
But the outlines of the dispute are clear from the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law each side submitted in April.
During the 1990s, Washington University professor Eduardo Slatopolsky and University of Wisconsin-Madison professor Hector DeLuca discovered a method of administering a Vitamin D analog called paricalcitol to treat a kidney ailment called renal osteodystrophy, or RO. The two universities entered into a contract under which the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation would take the lead in patenting and licensing the technology, while Washington University would receive 33 percent of any resulting revenues.
WARF ultimately licensed the '815 patent and two others to AbbVie predecessor Abbott Laboratories that support its kidney drug Zemplar, and collected $428 million in royalties over 18 years. But it calculated that the '815 patent was worth only 1 percent of the revenue stream, and the two other patents—wholly owned by WARF—were worth 99 percent. After additional calculations, Washington University received just over $1 million.
Wisconsin had argued the 1 percent allocation was justified because it held the patent on the Zemplar compound, and it wasn't clear that the '815 method held much value for Abbott. But in an internal 2008 email, WARF's director of licensing sung the praises of the '815 patent, saying “the reality” is that Abbott marketed the method to a broad range of kidney patients.
Washington University argued that Wisconsin should be equitably estopped from asserting the statute of limitations because of its concealment. “Washington University learned only in discovery that WARF had ignored all relevant valuation evidence when WARF assigned the parties' '815 patent a negligible 0.968% relative value,” the university argued in a filing signed by Ashby & Geddes director John Day.
Washington University's trial team also included Morrison & Foerster partner Michael Jacobs and associates Christopher Robinson and Elizabeth Ann Patterson and Ashby & Geddes director Andrew Mayo.
WARF, which is represented by Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner and Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell, told Bataillon there was no self-dealing. Rather, Washington University was looking back “with 20-20 hindsight at a 20-year-old agreement and now contends, based on unforeseen actions by Abbott, that the original agreement was unfair and WashU is entitled to more money.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMorgan Lewis Shutters Shenzhen Office Less Than Two Years After Launch
Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
4 minute read‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
5 minute readState Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250