5 Ways Board Members Can Limit #MeToo Risks, Insure Independent Investigations
With reports claiming former CEO Les Moonves obstructed an internal investigation of sexual misconduct allegations at CBS, here's a look at five ways board members can prevent harassment, and keep investigations independent.
December 05, 2018 at 05:34 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
More than a year into #MeToo, sexual harassment claims have hit company leaders in entertainment, law and other industries, and launched a series of internal investigations into misconduct.
But not all of those investigations have gone uninterrupted. According the New York Times, a drafted report for CBS's board of directors claims former company CEO Leslie Moonves destroyed evidence and obstructed an investigation of his own sexual misconduct allegations.
Moonves' alleged harassment and assault of women at CBS, as well as investigation tampering, gives the board justification to deny him his $120 million severance package, the report said.
There are ways that boards can mitigate and prevent #MeToo risks before it gets to this stage. Here are some tips on how the board can prevent sexual harassment at the company and help ensure allegations and investigations are handled properly.
1. Take a look at policies and training: The best defense is a good offense. Boards should ensure company policies are up to date with industry standards, and take a clear stance against sexual harassment in the workplace. It's also important to have training in place for employees at all levels of management, said Elizabeth Torphy-Donzella, a litigation partner at Shawe Rosenthal. “Demand to review the policies and procedures in place,” she said. “Making sure that [board members] lay their eyes on the harassment and discrimination policies, the code of ethics, to make sure that they meet prevailing legal standards.”
2. Get reports from HR and legal: Board members can spot an issue sooner by getting reports from legal and human relations teams. These departments can provide analysis on complaint trends. If one area of the company or an individual has received a growing number of harassment complaints, the board should know.
Board members should let legal and HR know what types of matters should be flagged in meetings, said Cristina Rodriguez, a partner at Hogan Lovells who handles litigation and investigations.
“I have seen clients have internal protocols for [notifying the board] and I think board members should ask whether there are those protocols,” Rodriguez said. “If there aren't, they should convey their expectations, 'Look we don't have a written protocol but if there is anybody in the C-suite against whom there is an allegation of harassment or an allegation of other serious misconduct, I want to at least know about it.'”
3. Make expectations for the C-suite known: Entry-level employees and C-suite executives alike should know that harassment at work will not be tolerated, and that if they are harassed or assaulted by anyone in the organization, their claims will be taken seriously. The board should inform executives that allegations against C-suite members must be disclosed.
“The reality is the C-suite, in my view, is charged with modeling the conduct that is excepted of everyone in the company. … It would seem to me the board should make clear to the whole C-suite that, look, we hold you out as exemplars,” Rodriguez said.
4. Investigations should be independent: When allegations against the CEO are being investigated, the CEO should not have power over that investigation. In fact, the entire process should be handled by someone independent from outside the company, not HR. If it's a law firm commonly used by a GC being investigated, turn to a new firm without strong ties to the individual under investigation, Rodriguez said.
“Make the demand that the CEO not be the final arbiter, that the board be the recipient of and the monitor of the investigations involving the CEO or anyone in that C-suite. The CEO cannot have control over that [investigation] or veto power,” Torphy-Donzella said.
5. Create a culture where employees feel heard: Having a hotline or online system where people can report harassment or assault can be helpful, Rodriguez said, so that there's a clear place for employees to speak out. Employees also may be more likely to report harassment and assault if they feel their voice matters.
Board members making occasional rounds through company offices so all workers feel they matter to the board could help promote people coming forward when there is an issue, Torphy-Donzella said. “Setting the tone from the top is important,” she said. “It can be as small as board members periodically as a group visiting departments, make their presence known and letting people know that they're not removed from them and they're not on a pinnacle that is unapproachable.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllScammers Target Lawyers Across Country With Fake Court Notices
'The Most Peculiar Federal Court in the Country' Comes to Berkeley Law
Trending Stories
- 1Reminder: Court Rules and Statutes Apply to Pendente Lite Custody Decisions
- 2Consumer Cleared to Proceed With Claims Against CVS 'Non-Drowsy' Medication, Judge Says
- 3Ex-Schnader Partner Nears Settlement in Misappropriated Comp Class Action
- 4The Increase in Artificial Intelligence-Related Securities Class Actions
- 5Trump’s DOE Pick Could Spell Trouble for Title IX Enforcement, Higher Ed Funding
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250