Beverly Hills Doctor's Suit Claims Dun & Bradstreet Credit Report Falsely Flagged Sex Crimes
A Beverly Hills doctor is seeking more than $22 million in damages from business intelligence giant Dun & Bradstreet, claiming the New Jersey-based company defamed him by falsely documenting an arrest for sending sexually explicit material to an undercover cop posing as a teenager.
December 07, 2018 at 05:22 PM
3 minute read
A Beverly Hills doctor is seeking more than $22 million in damages from business intelligence giant Dun & Bradstreet, claiming the New Jersey-based company defamed him by falsely documenting an arrest for sending sexually explicit material to an undercover cop posing as a teenager.
Dr. Jonathan Ellis, a gastroenterologist, filed the lawsuit against Dun & Bradstreet in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on Dec. 3.
The company didn't respond to a request for comment Friday, and it was not clear as of Friday whether Dun & Bradstreet, which is based in Short Hills, New Jersey, had been served with a copy of the complaint.
The lawsuit claims Ellis, the owner and chief executive officer of Doheny Endosurgical Center in Beverly Hills, was defamed when Dun & Bradstreet, in a report issued to credit service companies, as well as suppliers and other businesses, said Ellis had been arrested on four counts of distributing child pornography to a minor. The report cited media reports from last April, according to the complaint.
However, the Dun & Bradstreet report was erroneous. The arrest, according to the lawsuit, involved another doctor, a general practitioner with the same last name but a differently spelled first name who, at least at the time, practiced at College Medical Center in Long Beach, California. That doctor allegedly sent pornographic material to an undercover officer posing as a 16-year-old girl, according to reports in the Long Beach Patch and a local NBC affiliate, both quoting the Los Angeles Police Department.
Plaintiff Ellis is represented by Erik Syverson of Syverson, Lesowitz & Gebelin in Los Angeles.
Syverson said Dun & Bradstreet corrected the report, but not before the original, erroneous report had been distributed throughout the Southern California business community.
By then, the lawsuit said, the damage to the plaintiff had been done.
“This matter concerns the egregious and completely false defamation of a highly respected and well-regarded gastroenterologist,” the lawsuit alleged.
“As a result of the outrageous and toxic defamation, Dr. Ellis has suffered and continues to suffer extraordinary damages to his personal and professional reputation, emotional distress and significant economic losses,” the complaint said.
Ellis is a graduate of Stanford University and its medical school and an adjunct professor at UCLA's Geffen School of Medicine.
The lawsuit said Dun & Bradstreet failed to conduct a proper investigation before publishing the arrest notice.
“Even a minimal amount of investigation” would have revealed the conflicting information, the lawsuit said, alleging libel and false light publicity, and seeking $15 million in economic damages, $7.5 million in special damages, and an unspecified amount of punitive damages.
Syverson said professionals such as Ellis rely on companies such as Dun & Bradstreet to disseminate correct information.
“This case will put the business practices of Dun & Bradstreet on trial,” Syverson said, adding that the company's notice was “reckless and frivolous.”
“They don't verify information, and we will expose them,” Syverson said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMeta Seeks Declaratory Judgment in VR Eyewear Tech Patent Infringement Case
Plaintiffs Seek to Avoid Jurisdiction Fight in IVF Case, Challenge CooperSurgical in Connecticut
4 minute readPorsche's Venture Capital Arm Adds General Counsel From Clifford Chance
Trending Stories
- 1SEC Chair Gary Gensler to Resign on Trump's Inauguration Day
- 2How I Made Partner: 'Develop a Practice Area You Really Care About ,' Says Jennifer Gniady of Stradley Ronon
- 3Indian Billionaire Gautam Adani Indicted in Brooklyn for Alleged Orchestration of $250 Million Bribery Plot
- 4St. Ivo: Patron Saint of Lawyers
- 5Eagle Pharma Founder Sues Company to Recoup Cost of SEC Investigation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250