Millennial Attorneys and the Pressure to be Perfect
Perfection is an impossible standard. Yet, it is the standard by which many attorneys measure their professional success—or worse, personal worth.
December 07, 2018 at 03:09 PM
6 minute read
Early in my career, I received the well-intentioned advice to be mindful of typographical errors. As my colleague stated, if a client is paying tens of thousands of dollars for a brief, it better be perfect with every comma in the right place. Emails, I was told, were a reflection of my ability to pay attention to detail. I became obsessed with checking my emails for mistakes, sometimes reading a three-sentence email up to five or six times. Soon, I realized my habits were actually crippling my efficiency, and that while I should work to the best of my ability, I could not realistically expect myself to be completely error-free.
Perfection is an impossible standard. Yet, it is the standard by which many attorneys measure their professional success—or worse, personal worth. Perfectionism is a common thread in incidents that highlight the importance of mental health in attorneys, including the recent suicide of a Sidley Austin partner or the heroin overdose of a Wilson Sonsini Goodrich Rosati partner.
Millennials, more than any other generation, feel the pressure to be perfect. An American Psychological Association study of college students between 1989 and 2016 provides alarming statistics regarding the generational changes related to perfectionism: a 10 percent increase in self-directed perfectionism, 33 percent increase in socially prescribed perfectionism, and 16 percent increase in perfectionistic standards applied to others. Factors contributing to these increases may include the current economy with its diminishing middle class, increased societal emphasis on meritocracy, and increased competition in the job market. Millennials may also face the pressure of curating their personal lives on social media, contributing to the pressure to be, or appear to be, perfect in every setting.
For millennials who are attorneys, perfectionist tendencies can become amplified due to the realities of legal practice. First, clients rightfully expect high quality work. This expectation can trickle down to all members of legal service providers, including millennials who are already inclined to perfectionism. Attorneys may also feel the self-directed pressure of providing good work and not “letting down” their teams or clients. Second, mistakes can be costly, both for the life of a matter and in terms of career progression within the organization. For example, a mistake in a high-stakes matter could cost a client a case, cost a partner a client, or cost an associate an important intra-organizational relationship. Mistakes can also affect an attorney's reputation or prospects for promotion. Third, attorneys may feel constant pressure to appear confident and in command. This pressure may lead to a perception that vulnerability is undesired or weak, and create two layers of stress: the “original” stress of producing high quality work, and the “secondary” stress of having to hide any emotion perceived as negative, such as anxiety or nervousness.
Perfectionism in millennial attorneys may have a profound effect on mental health because perfectionism is a paradox: it sets a standard that is impossible to achieve, yet the standards can seem eminently reasonable. When the expectations (whether self-imposed or otherwise) are not met, it can lead to individuals feeling that they have failed or that they themselves are failures. Indeed, as studies have confirmed, there is a link between perfectionism and an increase in mental health problems such as anxiety, depression, and substance abuse. Attorneys who feel pressure to be perfect may be less likely to seek help when needed due to worries of what others may think and whether they will gain a reputation of not being able to “handle” the pressures of being an attorney.
It seems clear that a positive step toward improving mental health in millennial attorneys would be to minimize stress resulting from perfectionism and to offer coping tools to attorneys who experience it. The following are some tips for millennial attorneys:
- Ask for help if needed. Trained mental health professionals can be a great resource. The organization you work for may also have mental health initiatives and support services, such as mindfulness training, work-life balance programs, and/or professional coaches.
- Seek mentorship. Mentors can not only provide much needed perspective, but also substantive guidance on work product. Mentors need not necessarily be seniors. Your peers can exchange ideas with you regarding how to balance career pressures or navigate the political landscape of the organization. Additionally, meaningful connections with coworkers can help decrease feelings of isolation and make work more enjoyable.
- Utilize the resources at your disposal. Your organization may have resources to assist with tasks such as proofreading or cite checking. Taking advantage of these resources could prevent mistakes that are small, yet costly. Work collaboratively in a team when possible so the risk of mistakes can be minimized or distributed. Playing to the strengths of each team member may also help strengthen overall work product.
- Remind yourself that mistakes are natural. Even those you look up to, including the most senior partners, have made mistakes during the course of their careers. If it seems impossible to make everyone happy or get to everything, remember that you are human, not super-human. Give yourself the gift of forgiveness.
- Reframe mistakes as opportunities. Lawyers are often put in less-than-ideal situations, and it can be satisfying to think of creative solutions. Recognize that dwelling on the problem will not help. Own up to any mistakes and brainstorm options for moving forward. This may help assure those around you that you are willing to take responsibility for your mistakes in a manner that is productive for everyone. Thinking of a solution may also provide you peace of mind regarding the mistake or serve as a positive learning opportunity.
- Try mindfulness. The connection between mindfulness and mental well being is well-documented. Mindfulness is the practice of being in the present moment. Incorporating techniques such as deep-breathing, observing your surroundings, or meditating can have a profound impact over time.
- Avoid comparison. Every attorney and every career path is unique. Know that this diversity will only enhance the legal practice of your organization and embrace what you bring to the table.
Shilpa Coorg is an associate at Winston & Strawn in Los Angeles. She focuses her practice on patent litigation, including pharmaceutical litigation under Hatch-Waxman. She represents and advises industry leaders on intellectual property matters across a broad spectrum of technologies.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBuild It and They Will Come: Tips to Market Your Practice as a Junior Attorney
6 minute readYelp Sues Google for Alleged Antitrust Violations, Citing Previous 'Watershed' Government Ruling
There's Something in the Water: San Diego Is Once Again a Hot Market for National Law Firms
6 minute readWhat Happens When You Go Viral? How a Law Firm Associate Manages Her Social Media Success
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How ‘Bilateral Tapping’ Can Help with Stress and Anxiety
- 2How Law Firms Can Make Business Services a Performance Champion
- 3'Digital Mindset': Hogan Lovells' New Global Managing Partner for Digitalization
- 4Silk Road Founder Ross Ulbricht Has New York Sentence Pardoned by Trump
- 5Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250