Image: Shutterstock.comGoogle, Square Officials Point to Hot Market for Legal Operations Experts
Legal ops leaders in Silicon Valley said professionals who can combine operational and tech savvy are in high demand.
December 13, 2018 at 12:08 PM
3 minute read
Legal professionals who can marshal new technologies, products and processes to improve business are in the catbird seat in today's market, legal operations leaders at Google and Square, Inc. said at a panel discussion this week.
The panel, “Where Legal Technology is Headed (for better or worse),” hosted by Mountain View-based legal operations startup SimpleLegal, featured Mary O'Carroll, head of legal operations at Google, Stephanie Lamoureaux, legal operations lead at Square, and Nathan Wenzel, CEO of SimpleLegal. James Maguire, a senior managing editor at Datamation, moderated the discussion.
O'Carroll told the group there had been an “explosion of growth” in the legal operations field. “Now you look around, every company, whether it's big or small, is scrambling to find someone in this role.”
In-house departments began to ramp up hiring of legal operations professionals in 2008, during the recession said O'Carroll.
Google's Mary O'Carroll at a CLOC event earlier this year. Photo: Caroline Speizio
“GCs were suddenly getting their doors knocked on by the CFOs, saying, 'everyone is tightening their belts. You guys need to too. What are you doing?'” she said.
Demand for such expertise has continued to grow as legal operations becomes a more central issue for companies, including efforts to maximize their investments in their legal teams, legal vendors and legal technologies.
“Legal operations and legal technology are linked, and really tied at the hip,” said Wenzel, noting that legal ops professionals are driving the adoption of new legal technologies.
Lamoureaux, who just joined mobile payment company Square from Twitter last year, said she recently made a new hire at Square to bridge the gap between the companies' technology and legal goals.
“There has been more focus on legal operations and what legal operations can do,” said Lamoureaux. “I definitely feel a lot more reliance on me than I did even five years ago.”
And because legal operations is still a relatively new, dynamic field within the legal industry, Lamoureaux added, the profession has been attracting people with diverse experience, backgrounds, and skills.
The panelists pointed to the growth in recent years of the Corporate Legal Operations Consortium (CLOC), one the leading organizations focused on in-house operations issues, to highlight the growing importance of the field. And, they suggested, it's becoming an area in which companies are more openly in competition with one another.
Wenzel said legal departments are feeling internal pressures to improve operations even as the market keeps presenting new solutions to do business faster and more effectively.
“That dual pressure—from the financial point of view and the bottom-up pressure from the vendor side—is a big part of what's driving that demand for legal ops and for the legal tech to scale that solution out,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Faegre Drinker Adds Three Former Federal Prosecutors From Greenberg Traurig
4 minute read
Anapol Weiss Acquires Boutique Led by Star Litigator Alexandra Walsh
5 minute read
Pierson Ferdinand Lures Veteran M&A Specialist From Sheppard Mullin in Silicon Valley
4 minute read
Alston & Bird Enters Chicago, Adds Second LA Office With Sidley Austin Trio
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 2Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 3Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 4Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 5The Law Firm Disrupted: Big Law Profits Vs. Political Values
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
