Apple Sued Over 'False Pixel Counts' in iPhone X Models
Filed in California, the lawsuit proposes nationwide, New York and California classes in going after Apple for allegedly overstating features of iPhone X, XS and XS Max phones.
December 17, 2018 at 04:54 PM
3 minute read
|
Apple Inc. is facing a class action claiming it paints a misleading picture of the size, resolution and pixel count on the screens on iPhone X, XS, and XS Max models.
The lawsuit, filed Friday in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, accuses Apple of violating consumer protection laws in all 50 states via advertisements on its website that allegedly misrepresent the pixel counts and screen sizes of its phones. Plaintiffs attorney David Makman wrote that the iPhones “have half the advertised number of pixels.”
The “screen size deception,” he wrote, “is simply based on Apple cutting corners.”
“Defendant rounds off the corners of the products' screens and the Products have notches without pixels at the top of their screen, but Defendant calculates the screen size of the Products by including non-screen areas such as the corners and the cut-out notch at the top of the screen,” Makman wrote. “The missing screen areas also reduce the false pixel counts of the products' screens below their advertised pixel counts.”
Though filed in California, the suit also seeks to certify classes in New York and nationally, with claims against Apple brought under both states' respective false advertising laws. The suit also claims violations of California's Consumer Legal Remedies Act and Unfair Competition Law, as well as New York's Deceptive Acts and Practices Act.
“Defendant's marketing of its products falsely inflates their screens' supposed pixel counts, resolutions, and sizes to make the products seem more appealing to consumers,” the complaint says. “Defendant has been unjustly enriched as a result of its unlawful conduct.”
Makman declined to comment on the lawsuit. Also representing the two plaintiffs—residents of California and New York, respectively—is C.K. Lee, a New York-based managing member of Lee Litigation Group. The New York Post has described the firm as “thriving” in New York's “distorted tort system” by bringing more than 1,000 class action suits in Manhattan and Brooklyn federal courts between 2009 and January 2018.
Neither Apple nor Lee responded to requests for comment by press time.
Apple is no stranger to litigation over its popular iPhones. A spate of lawsuits over the company's alleged intentional slowing of processing speeds on older iPhones resulted in a multidistrict litigation. Additionally, Apple found itself involved separate patent disputes with WiLan and Qualcomm over technology in its iPhones.
The pixel litigation initially has been assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins. An initial case management conference is scheduled for March 20 in San Jose.
Read the Complaint:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMeta Seeks Declaratory Judgment in VR Eyewear Tech Patent Infringement Case
Plaintiffs Seek to Avoid Jurisdiction Fight in IVF Case, Challenge CooperSurgical in Connecticut
4 minute readPorsche's Venture Capital Arm Adds General Counsel From Clifford Chance
Trending Stories
- 1GC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
- 2Legal Events for Georgia Lawyers
- 3'There is No Time to Waste': Matt Gaetz Withdraws From AG Nomination
- 4The Growing PFAS Morass: Why Insurance Should Cover These Products Liability Claims
- 5Dallas Jury Awards $98.65M in Botham Jean Killing by Dallas Officer
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250