Judge Poised to Extend Injunction on Trump Rule Restricting Asylum for Southern Border-Crossers
U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar previously issued a temporary restraining order blocking a Trump administration rule barring asylum for migrants who cross the southern border outside of designated ports of entry.
December 19, 2018 at 02:02 PM
2 minute read
A federal judge in San Francisco is poised to extend an injunction blocking the Trump administration rule barring asylum for migrants crossing the southern border outside of designated ports of entry.
Judge Jon Tigar, who last month issued a temporary restraining order blocking the rules, noted at a hearing Wednesday morning that his ruling in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California had already been reviewed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Earlier this month, the Ninth Circuit largely upheld Tigar's ruling in an opinion by Judge Jay Bybee, which called the move an “end run around Congress.”
“Almost all the questions that are before the court this morning have already been resolved twice,” Tigar said. “I'm not allowed to disagree with the Ninth Circuit,” Tigar noted, adding that he was “unlikely” to disagree with himself.
Nonprofit groups filed suit last month following a proclamation from President Donald Trump and an interim final rule from acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker and Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen barring asylum for people crossing the southern U.S. border outside of designated ports of entry. Tigar, however, previously found that new rule “irreconcilably conflicts with the INA and the expressed intent of Congress.”
“Whatever the scope of the president's authority, he may not rewrite the immigration laws to impose a condition that Congress has expressly forbidden,” Tigar wrote in his order.
Tigar opened Wednesday's hearing by telling the government's lead lawyer, DOJ Civil Division Deputy Assistant Attorney General Scott Stewart, that he found the government's position on the scope of the injunction impractical. The government had proposed that any injunction applies only to actual clients of the four non-profit group plaintiffs in the lawsuit.
“If I were to adopt the government's view,” Tigar said, “that would make them the most popular legal aid agencies at the border.”
The temporary restraining order Tigar issued on Nov. 19 is set to expire at midnight on Wednesday. Tigar said he hoped to have an order out on the matter before that time.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAfter Solving Problems for Presidents, Ron Klain Now Applying Legal Prowess to Helping Airbnb Overturn NYC Ban
7 minute readDOJ, 10 State AGs File Amended Antitrust Complaint Against RealPage and Big Landlords
4 minute readPentagon Settles Suit Seeking to Clear Records of Service Members Discharged for Being LGBTQ
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1South Carolina Physicians Challenge Abortion Ban Under Religious Freedom Claims
- 2Special Series Part 5: The State’s Bond Lock Impermissibly Delegates Legislative Authority
- 3President-Elect Donald Trump Sentenced to Unconditional Discharge
- 4JCPenney Customer's Slip-and-Fall From Bodily Substance Suit Best Left for a Jury to Decide, Judge Rules
- 5Products Liability: The Absence of Other Similar Claims—a Defense or a Misleading Effort to Sway a Jury?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250