J&J Talc Trial Opens This Week in a New Calif. Venue
Veteran talc lawyers on both sides gave opening statements on Monday in Alameda County Superior Court.
January 07, 2019 at 07:13 PM
2 minute read
Two legal teams with experience in cases alleging Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder products caused mesothelioma faced off on Monday in a trial with a new venue: Alameda County.
“We have a lot of documents. You're going to see a lot of documents,” plaintiffs' lawyer Joseph Satterley of Kazan, McClain, Satterley & Greenwood told jurors in an opening statement on Monday, according to coverage of the trial by Courtroom View Network. “The evidence will be that J&J knew the asbestos risk, and they continued to sell the product.”
Satterly represents Teresa Leavitt, a California woman diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2017. His team, which includes firm colleague Denyse Clancy as well as Moshe Maimon of Levy Konigsberg in New York, won a $117 million verdict last year in New Jersey.
Michael Brown, of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough in Baltimore, Maryland, represents Johnson & Johnson. Brown, who is working with firm colleague Scott Richman, and several lawyers from Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, teamed up last year with Bruce Bishop, of Willcox & Savage in Norfolk, Virginia, in representing Johnson & Johnson in a South Carolina case that ended in a mistrial.
Johnson & Johnson plans to make an opening statement on Tuesday. On Monday, its lawyers at Orrick filed a trial brief to exclude references to news articles about talcum powder – in particular, a Dec. 14 investigative piece by Reuters that they called “one-sided” and “replete with misleading statements, critical omissions and inaccuracies.”
Dentons partner Brad DeJardin in Los Angeles also gave opening statements on Monday on behalf of defendant Imerys Talc America Inc.
This week's trial, in Alameda County Superior Court, involves Leavitt and her husband, Dean McElroy, of San Leandro, California, who allege that her lifetime use of Johnson & Johnson's baby powder, including as a base for makeup or dry shampoo, caused her mesothelioma diagnosis.
Alameda County Superior Court Judge Brad Seligman is presiding over the trial.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAt DataGrail Summit, Legal Leaders Call for Transparency in the Age of AI
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar with Saul' Part IV: Deliberations Begin in First Trump Criminal Trial
1 minute read'What Are We Fixing?': ABA Rejects Proposal to Make Law School Admissions Tests Optional
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250