As Mergers Surge Industrywide, California Law Firms May Face More Offers
Law firm merger activity in California is not slowing down.
January 14, 2019 at 04:18 PM
3 minute read
The pace of law firm mergers in California is not likely to slow soon, industry watchers say.
2018 was a record year for law firm combinations, with 106 mergers announced industrywide, according to Altman Weil MergerLine, which tracks law firm combinations. According to MergerLine, 11 of those combinations involved at least one California-based firm.
Four out-of-town firms acquired California boutiques in 2018, three California-based midsize firms announced acquisitions of smaller shops in California, and two California boutiques acquired smaller firms on the East Coast. Los Angeles-based Littler Mendelson also made two acquisitions outside the U.S.
In 2017, there were 13 law firm tie-ups involving at least one California firm, according to Altman Weil, including five acquisitions of California firms with 20 or more lawyers.
Consultants expect the momentum to continue into 2019, and that firms' interest in expanding in California will only grow.
“California never fades as an attractive place for large law firms to be. There are always East Coast firms looking to plant the flag in California and become bicoastal,” said Eric Seeger, a principal at Willow Grove, Pennsylvania-based Altman Weil.
To that end, two East Coast-based Am Law 200 firms have already announced in 2019 that they bolstered their Golden State presences by acquiring local boutiques.
Washington, D.C.-based Arent Fox absorbed a group of seven attorneys from San Francisco law firm Kay & Merkle, which specializes in the real estate and automotive industries. And Philadelphia-based Blank Rome added five more family law attorneys from Los Angeles-based Buter, Buzard, Fishbein & Royce.
“Most law firm mergers we see nationally are small firms combining with other small firms,” Seeger said. “California is a bit different in that we see more large firms acquiring small firms as a means of getting into the West Coast market.”
Also this year, Dallas-based Munck Wilson Mandala announced its combination with intellectual property and entertainment boutique The Hecker Law Group, allowing the firm to launch a new Los Angeles office with four attorneys, led by Gary Hecker.
“Another thing that is different these days is more smaller firms are open to mergers than we've ever experienced,” Seeger added, “that's driven by both opportunity and need on the part of the smaller firms.”
However, not all law firm marriages ended up to be the perfect match. A bit more than a year after folding his Palo Alto, California-based intellectual property boutique into Squire Patton Boggs, partner Ronald Fernando reconstituted his old shop last August with several current and former colleagues, claiming that “the business relationship didn't work.” But Squire Patton Boggs continued to show its interest in the region in 2018, when it absorbed another Silicon Valley firm, Singularity, to build up its IP practice.
“The Bay Area has been an attractive market for law firms for years,” said law firm merger consultant Kent Zimmermann of the Zeughauser Group, noting that since the tech boom, there have been more law firms interested in expanding in Northern California.
While most of the acquisitions have been for the small firms, Zimmermann said he expects there to be “more and larger combinations” in the Golden State going forward.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllO'Melveny Secures Global Clearances for Korean Air-Asiana Merger
FTC Bans Exec From Chevron Board—Exercising Authority It Doesn't Have, GOP Dissenters Say
5 minute readDeal Watch: Latham, Ropes, S&C, Cravath and Simpson Advise on Massive Paramount/Skydance Deal
6 minute readMunger Tolles Advises New Stability AI CEO, Executive Chairman in Funding Deal
Trending Stories
- 1Tuesday Newspaper
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-85
- 3Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 4Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 5Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250