Salary Guide Shows Average In-House Lawyer Gets Paid Less, but Has Better Perks
In-house lawyers earn less than their firm peers on average but are more likely to receive perks such as paid-for concerts or sabbaticals, according to survey results from legal consulting company Special Counsel.
January 15, 2019 at 03:46 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
In-house counsel are earning less than their law firm counterparts, but they're more likely to get fun benefits, a new survey finds.
Legal consulting company Special Counsel released the results of its 2019 Salary Guide for Legal Professionals Tuesday. The guide comes from a survey of more than 6,000 legal professionals, including around 1,000 in-house counsel, from various sized firms and companies in 60 U.S. cities.
Responding chief legal officers and general counsel had an average total cash compensation of $333,467 and a base salary of $248,830. Equity partners at firms reported an average total cash compensation of $732,047 with a $421,508 base salary.
Associate GCs and assistant GCs reported an average $199,387 base salary and $222,691 total cash compensation. Senior counsel averaged $216,753 in total cash compensation and counsel averaged $153,370. At firms, senior associates had an average $240,785 in total compensation.
“We were noticing that benefits were playing a bigger role, especially when you were looking at attorneys looking to leave big law. Knowing that they were going to take some type of pay cut, what do the benefits look like?” Amanda Ellis, senior vice president of legal staffing at Special Counsel, told The Recorder affiliate Corporate Counsel. “And that's where we started seeing people being more interested in the nontraditional benefits rather than traditional benefits.”
Company lawyers reported perks of the job outside of salary. Almost 20 percent of in-house legal teams offer paid volunteer time to employees. Forty percent offered an on-site gym or wellness benefit and 18 percent had an on-site cafeteria or offered paid meals.
Special Counsel said allowing pets at work, car allowances and extra days off were inexpensive, popular extra perks companies offered. This year is the first time Special Counsel included benefits in its analysis because of an observed shift in what employees want from employers.
“Where the corporations came out ahead were on things like the paid sabbaticals, for example. Most of the people who responded with that answer came from a corporate legal department,” Ellis said. “We had several of our in-house candidates talk about experience bonuses, where the company or the legal department would pay them a set amount … to take that trip they want to take, or go to a concert they want to attend. Something that makes them happy.”
Law firms may not have flashy perks, but they do offer more traditional benefits.
Nearly half of surveyed firms offered paid paternity/maternity leave, compared to 35 percent of in-house departments. More than 10 percent of firms also offered on-site or emergency child care. Most respondents from medium and large firms, as well as in-house departments, were offered flexible work schedules or arrangements.
“Part of it is law firms steeped in tradition and history [are] reluctant to make drastic changes like bringing pets to work. Maybe a smaller firm, but I don't see many big firms doing that on a regular basis,” Ellis said.
Read More:
Apple GC Kate Adams' $5M Compensation Outlined in SEC Filing
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllElevate Acquires Intellectual Property Research Provider Sagacious IP
3 minute readFederal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit
4 minute readArentFox Schiff Adds Global Complex Litigation Partner in Los Angeles
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250