Salary Guide Shows Average In-House Lawyer Gets Paid Less, but Has Better Perks
In-house lawyers earn less than their firm peers on average but are more likely to receive perks such as paid-for concerts or sabbaticals, according to survey results from legal consulting company Special Counsel.
January 15, 2019 at 03:46 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
In-house counsel are earning less than their law firm counterparts, but they're more likely to get fun benefits, a new survey finds.
Legal consulting company Special Counsel released the results of its 2019 Salary Guide for Legal Professionals Tuesday. The guide comes from a survey of more than 6,000 legal professionals, including around 1,000 in-house counsel, from various sized firms and companies in 60 U.S. cities.
Responding chief legal officers and general counsel had an average total cash compensation of $333,467 and a base salary of $248,830. Equity partners at firms reported an average total cash compensation of $732,047 with a $421,508 base salary.
Associate GCs and assistant GCs reported an average $199,387 base salary and $222,691 total cash compensation. Senior counsel averaged $216,753 in total cash compensation and counsel averaged $153,370. At firms, senior associates had an average $240,785 in total compensation.
“We were noticing that benefits were playing a bigger role, especially when you were looking at attorneys looking to leave big law. Knowing that they were going to take some type of pay cut, what do the benefits look like?” Amanda Ellis, senior vice president of legal staffing at Special Counsel, told The Recorder affiliate Corporate Counsel. “And that's where we started seeing people being more interested in the nontraditional benefits rather than traditional benefits.”
Company lawyers reported perks of the job outside of salary. Almost 20 percent of in-house legal teams offer paid volunteer time to employees. Forty percent offered an on-site gym or wellness benefit and 18 percent had an on-site cafeteria or offered paid meals.
Special Counsel said allowing pets at work, car allowances and extra days off were inexpensive, popular extra perks companies offered. This year is the first time Special Counsel included benefits in its analysis because of an observed shift in what employees want from employers.
“Where the corporations came out ahead were on things like the paid sabbaticals, for example. Most of the people who responded with that answer came from a corporate legal department,” Ellis said. “We had several of our in-house candidates talk about experience bonuses, where the company or the legal department would pay them a set amount … to take that trip they want to take, or go to a concert they want to attend. Something that makes them happy.”
Law firms may not have flashy perks, but they do offer more traditional benefits.
Nearly half of surveyed firms offered paid paternity/maternity leave, compared to 35 percent of in-house departments. More than 10 percent of firms also offered on-site or emergency child care. Most respondents from medium and large firms, as well as in-house departments, were offered flexible work schedules or arrangements.
“Part of it is law firms steeped in tradition and history [are] reluctant to make drastic changes like bringing pets to work. Maybe a smaller firm, but I don't see many big firms doing that on a regular basis,” Ellis said.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
5 minute readCourt rejects request to sideline San Jose State volleyball player on grounds she’s transgender
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250