Girardi Keese Partner Bucks Back Against Alleged $15M Debt to 'Miserable, Rotten' Litigation Funder
Plaintiffs lawyer Thomas Girardi says that Law Finance Group has sued him for funds that were borrowed on behalf of clients. But the litigation funder's lawyer says the loan agreement clearly states the loan was to Girardi and his firm.
January 24, 2019 at 07:11 PM
4 minute read
Prominent plaintiffs attorney Thomas Girardi is pushing back against claims that he and his firm owe more than $15 million to Law Finance Group LLC.
The litigation funder sued Girardi and his firm, Girardi Keese, in Los Angeles Superior Court on Jan. 17 claiming that they've refused to hand over recovered fees from cases that the parties allegedly agreed would be used to repay the loans.
But in a phone message left with The Recorder Wednesday, Girardi said that the underlying loan was taken out on behalf of clients, not for him and the firm. Girardi said the money that was borrowed was “either advances or to pay costs of a major case.”
|
Related story: Litigation Funder Sues Thomas Girardi, Firm Claiming $15M+ in Unpaid Loans
Girardi said that one case, in particular, is tied up as clients have dealt with medical liens and other issues. “All the settlement funds did not come in and obviously we wanted our clients to get paid before some lender,” Girardi said.
Girardi called Law Finance Group “a miserable, rotten, despicable company” and said that the funder had rebuffed his offer of $65 million in stock he holds in a publicly traded company as additional collateral. He also suggested that funder sued only two days after another lender he had lined up to buy Law Finance Group out of its position reached out to make arrangements.
“Very interesting. So, that's the truth. Nice talking to you,” said Girardi at the conclusion of the 94-second voice message.
In a letter his assistant later sent via email to respond to follow-up questions, Girardi said he had been in contact with Law Finance Group's CEO Alan Zimmerman to explain it would likely take two or three weeks to finalize the deal with the new lender.
“I told Zimmerman that if his company needed any more security, I would set them up with $36 million worth of stock I have in a New York Exchange company until the new firm could make the loan. Two days later, this miserable, rotten, despicable company filed the lawsuit that you have a copy of,” Girardi said.
“To show you how miserable and disgusting they are, they talked about my lavish lifestyle when not one penny of this money went to me or to anyone in this law firm. We will see what a jury has to say about their conduct,” Girardi added.
Law Finance Group's lawyer, Leslie Corwin of Eisner APC, said Thursday that he stands behind every allegation in the complaint. Corwin defended his client's track record, and said the loan agreement underlying the dispute with Girardi was very clear.
“It's a loan to his law firm. It's a loan to him. Nowhere does it say it's a loan to his clients,” Corwin said.
Corwin said that Girardi “has never made a good-faith offer to me to take care of this matter or to make financial disclosures since I came into the case in November.”
“If some other lender wants to take him out that's fine,” Corwin said. “We want to be paid dollar for dollar.”
Girardi notably scored $333 million settlement on behalf of residents of Hinkley, California in the toxic tort case that inspired the film “Erin Brockovich.” Girardi's finances and those of the firm, however, have repeatedly been the subject of litigation with his wife joining the cast of Bravo's “The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills” in 2015.
|Read Girardi's full letter:
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHueston Hennigan Secures Dismissal of SEC Action Against Ex-PwC Auditor in Mattel-Linked Case
How Dana Rao Built a 'Yes' Culture at Adobe and Why He Walked Away
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'If You Love What You Do and Put the Time and Effort Into It, You Will Excel,' Says Lisa Saul of Forde & O'Meara
- 5Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250