Qualcomm Inc. shouldn’t expect a pretrial ruling from U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel on the reasonableness of its licensing offer to Apple Inc. before Apple filed its 2017 antitrust suit.

At least, that was the impression Curiel gave at a hearing Friday as the second of three Qualcomm antitrust trials draws closer. But Curiel sounded determined to go forward with an April jury trial, despite “all of the moving parts” generated by the sprawling antitrust litigation in San Diego and by the Federal Trade Commission’s antitrust action against Qualcomm in San Jose.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]