A Prediction From Alastair Mactaggart: Privacy Law Will Survive Tech Challenge
The San Francisco real estate developer behind California's sweeping data privacy law says there are ardent defenders among state legislators.
January 29, 2019 at 06:38 PM
3 minute read
Alastair Mactaggart, the San Francisco real estate developer behind California's sweeping data privacy law, said he's confident the regulations will withstand any attacks by the telecommunications and tech lobbies in the new legislative session.
Mactaggart, speaking to The Recorder on Tuesday, said the California Consumer Privacy Act has ardent defenders among state legislators, including Sen. Robert Hertzberg, D-Van Nuys, and Assembly privacy committee chairman Ed Chau, D-Monterey Park—the two lawmakers who shepherded the enabling bill to passage last year. The public, too, has had more time to adjust to, and accept, the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation, he said.
Plus, Mactaggart added, tech companies continue to find themselves the subject of congressional scrutiny and unflattering headlines for how they handle users' personal information. The new law, which takes effect next January, will force companies to disclose what information they collect about customers and then delete that information upon request.
“There's enough visibility now” with the law, Mactaggart said. “This is a California right. Californians hate giving up their rights.”
Critics of the law, including Google, Comcast Corp., Verizon Communications Inc. and AT&T, accepted its adoption last year as the preferred alternative to an even more-expansive ballot initiative that Mactaggart was prepared to put before voters in November. The delay in its enforcement gives those industries a chance to push favorable amendments this year. With the bill introduction deadline still weeks away, no changes have been introduced yet.
“There was little input from the companies that will bear the burden of compliance,” Robert Callahan, vice president of government affairs for the Internet Association, wrote in a Sacramento Bee op-ed last month. “To pretend the law is without fault today is to ignore the realities of how the law came to be and the complexities of data regulation.”
Callahan and others may find a different legislative atmosphere this year. On Monday, legislative Republicans, typical allies of the tech industry, unveiled a package of their own data protection bills. One would give consumers the right to sue “any social media company” that does not close their accounts upon request and exclude their information from future sale.
“We want to expand what was passed last year, not take away from it,” said Assemblyman James Gallagher, R-Yuba City.
Mactaggart said he welcomes “more people on the privacy side of things, and we'll see where it goes.”
Mactaggart heads to Washington, D.C., next week to push against efforts to undermine California's law through federal pre-emption. He said he does not, as yet, have a meeting scheduled with Florida Republican Sen. Marco Rubio, who has proposed legislation that would bar states from enacting consumer privacy rules that are stricter than those adopted by the federal government.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIn Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
6 minute readMorrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250