A Prediction From Alastair Mactaggart: Privacy Law Will Survive Tech Challenge
The San Francisco real estate developer behind California's sweeping data privacy law says there are ardent defenders among state legislators.
January 29, 2019 at 06:38 PM
3 minute read
Alastair Mactaggart, the San Francisco real estate developer behind California's sweeping data privacy law, said he's confident the regulations will withstand any attacks by the telecommunications and tech lobbies in the new legislative session.
Mactaggart, speaking to The Recorder on Tuesday, said the California Consumer Privacy Act has ardent defenders among state legislators, including Sen. Robert Hertzberg, D-Van Nuys, and Assembly privacy committee chairman Ed Chau, D-Monterey Park—the two lawmakers who shepherded the enabling bill to passage last year. The public, too, has had more time to adjust to, and accept, the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation, he said.
Plus, Mactaggart added, tech companies continue to find themselves the subject of congressional scrutiny and unflattering headlines for how they handle users' personal information. The new law, which takes effect next January, will force companies to disclose what information they collect about customers and then delete that information upon request.
“There's enough visibility now” with the law, Mactaggart said. “This is a California right. Californians hate giving up their rights.”
Critics of the law, including Google, Comcast Corp., Verizon Communications Inc. and AT&T, accepted its adoption last year as the preferred alternative to an even more-expansive ballot initiative that Mactaggart was prepared to put before voters in November. The delay in its enforcement gives those industries a chance to push favorable amendments this year. With the bill introduction deadline still weeks away, no changes have been introduced yet.
“There was little input from the companies that will bear the burden of compliance,” Robert Callahan, vice president of government affairs for the Internet Association, wrote in a Sacramento Bee op-ed last month. “To pretend the law is without fault today is to ignore the realities of how the law came to be and the complexities of data regulation.”
Callahan and others may find a different legislative atmosphere this year. On Monday, legislative Republicans, typical allies of the tech industry, unveiled a package of their own data protection bills. One would give consumers the right to sue “any social media company” that does not close their accounts upon request and exclude their information from future sale.
“We want to expand what was passed last year, not take away from it,” said Assemblyman James Gallagher, R-Yuba City.
Mactaggart said he welcomes “more people on the privacy side of things, and we'll see where it goes.”
Mactaggart heads to Washington, D.C., next week to push against efforts to undermine California's law through federal pre-emption. He said he does not, as yet, have a meeting scheduled with Florida Republican Sen. Marco Rubio, who has proposed legislation that would bar states from enacting consumer privacy rules that are stricter than those adopted by the federal government.
Read more:
California Takes 'Giant Leap Forward' on Consumer Data-Privacy Rights
Anticipating the Flood of Cybersecurity Litigation Under the CCPA
California Judge May Have Changed the Conversation Around Biometrics Privacy
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Look to Gen Z for AI Skills, as 'Data Becomes the Oil of Legal'
Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250