Alsup Finds PG&E Violated Probation, Ponders Further Action to Address Wildfire 'Emergency'
"PG&E is not the only source of these fires but it is a source," U.S. District Judge William Alsup wrote. "And it is really to most of us unthinkable that a public utility would be out there causing that kind of damage."
January 30, 2019 at 07:11 PM
4 minute read
The judge overseeing the aftermath of PG&E Corp.'s 2016 safety-related felony conviction has found the company violated the terms of its probation by failing to fully disclose an investigation into the utility's role in a 2017 California wildfire.
U.S. District Judge William Alsup stopped short of imposing additional penalties on PG&E, which recently filed for bankruptcy with counsel from Cravath, Swaine & Moore. But the judge did say he was considering a number of potential additional restrictions, including ordering it to comply with California regulations regarding clearing brush from power lines, or forcing the utility to power down during threatening weather conditions.
State fire authorities, the judge noted, have found that PG&E equipment sparked 17 wildfires in the state in just one month in October 2017.
“We cannot continue to sustain this kind of catastrophic injury to the state,” said Alsup, noting that nearly 3 percent of the state's total acreage has burned in the past two fire seasons. “PG&E is not the only source of these fires, but it is a source. And it is really to most of us unthinkable that a public utility would be out there causing that kind of damage.”
“We have to have electricity in this state, but can we have electricity that is delivered safely?” the judge said.
Alsup is overseeing PG&E's probation following the company's August 2016 conviction on six felony counts stemming from the 2010 pipeline explosion in San Bruno. The blast killed eight people and injured dozens more. Alsup inherited the case after Judge Thelton Henderson, who oversaw the trial, retired in 2017.
Alsup noted Wednesday at the onset of the three-hour hearing that although PG&E is a company, his role in overseeing probation mirrors what it would be in the case of an individual, such as a someone convicted on drug charges.
“Part of my duty is to supervise that offender and to make sure that we try to bring them into compliance to the law and to protect the public from further harms from the offender,” Alsup said.
Kate Dyer of Clarence Dyer & Cohen, a member of PG&E's defense team, said that the company had provided the probation office with notification in May 2018 the same day that it reached a settlement with state fire authorities over wildfires investigators concluded that PG&E caused in 2017. She said that the company further provided the probation office with disclosures it made to investors in SEC filings the following month about the settlement.
But federal probation officer Jennifer Hutchings testified that PG&E had failed to disclose that it was the subject of a full criminal investigation related to 2017 fires, something the company is required to do under the terms of its probation. Hutchings said that she should have been informed “in much further detail.” Dyer declined to cross-examine Hutchings, and the judge found that PG&E violated the terms of its probation immediately after the probation officer's testimony.
The remainder of the hearing involved Alsup hearing from a variety of parties—the company, federal prosecutors, the California Public Utilities Commission, CalFire, and plaintiffs lawyers who represent victims of recent wildfires—about the appropriate course of action going forward.
PG&E is due to file a draft of its plan to manage vegetation along its power lines to the CPUC next week, as mandated under state legislation passed last year. But Alsup urged PG&E not to wait until the end of a months-long regulatory review process to take action before the coming fire season, which unofficially begins at the beginning of summer.
“We need strong medicine, come June 21,” Alsup said. “It has to be in place. We can't still be talking about it.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllExxonMobil Sues California AG Bonta, Environmental Groups for Advanced Recycling 'Smear Campaign'
Litigators of the Week: A $604.9M Trade Secrets Verdict With a Big Assist From a Juror Question
Securities Case Over Hawaiian Electric Company's Wildfire Readiness Dismissed
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250