In Dispute Over Koko's Companion, Judge Sides With Cincinnati Zoo
U.S. District Judge Richard Seeborg found that The Gorilla Foundation had agreed to let a third party decide where Ndume, a gorilla loaned to the organization by the zoo, would live after the death of Koko, the western lowland gorilla who famously learned sign language.
February 04, 2019 at 12:54 PM
4 minute read
A federal judge in San Francisco has sided with the Cincinnati Zoo in its dispute with a Bay Area nonprofit over the fate of longtime companion of Koko, the western lowland gorilla who famously learned sign language.
In a decision issued Friday, U.S. District Judge Richard Seeborg ordered The Gorilla Foundation, the Redwood City nonprofit that cared for Koko until her death in June 2018, to begin working with the zoo to arrange the transfer of Ndume, Koko's male companion.
The zoo loaned Ndume to the foundation nearly a quarter century ago in hopes that he and Koko would mate, but they never did. Seeborg ruled Friday that the foundation had entered into a valid agreement with the zoo prior to Koko's death to let an organization that oversees the well-being of captive gorillas in North America decide where Ndume should live in the case that he outlived Koko.
That organization has determined that Ndume should return to the zoo where he can interact with other gorillas. After Koko's death, he was the sole remaining gorilla housed at the foundation.
The foundation's lawyers at Casselman Law Group and Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy had argued that Ndume's age, 27 years of experience living under the foundation's care, and a dormant stomach infection would make any move a serious risk to the gorilla's health. But Seeborg concluded that the foundation was aware of those risks when it signed an updated agreement with the zoo in 2015.
Related story: Gorilla Foundation Moves to Sideline PETA in Fight Over Koko's Companion
“TGF's position is fatally undermined by the fact it made the agreement only three years ago, with full knowledge of the facts it now insists might give rise to unreasonable costs,” Seeborg wrote.
The judge, however, directed the zoo to entertain “in good faith” any suggestions the foundation has regarding Ndume's transfer and care.
“TGF, in turn, is to exercise the utmost good faith in presenting any suggestions or requests, and is directed to bear in mind that the question of whether Ndume will be transferred to the Zoo is no longer subject to negotiation,” the judge wrote.
Seeborg urged the parties to reach a consensus on the transfer noting that Ndume is “no ordinary chattel.”
“While the law recognizes that gorillas in captivity may be owned, neither the 2015 Agreement nor this order treats Ndume merely as property to be dealt according to the desires of the Zoo,” the judge wrote. He asked the parties to file a joint statement if they were at an impasse on any issues within 30 days of his Feb. 1 order.
Reached by email Monday, the foundation's lead lawyer, David Casselman of the Casselman Law Group, said his client is reviewing the situation and had no comment.
Counsel at Covington & Burling and Taft Stettinius & Hollister represent the zoo.
In a written statement, a spokesperson said that zoo was pleased that the judge was enforcing its agreement with the foundation as it is written.
“We look forward to working with The Gorilla Foundation to transfer Ndume to Cincinnati safely as soon as possible, so that he can once again live with other gorillas,” the spokesperson said.
Delcianna Winders, vice president and deputy general counsel of PETA, which filed an amicus brief backing the zoo in the case, issued a statement calling the ruling “a new life for Ndume the gorilla and … an official court declaration that an intelligent, sensitive gorilla is 'not ordinary chattel.' ”
“ We look to The Gorilla Foundation to follow the court's order and cooperate with the Cincinnati Zoo without delay so that Ndume can finally be supported by expert care and have the essential companionship of his fellow gorillas,” Winders said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWith AI Research Clustered in Hot Spots, Left-Out Regions Could Become Economic 'Deserts'
5 minute readMorgan Lewis Grows ESG Group, Adding Legal VP of Fidelity Foundations
It's 'Google v. Oracle' All Over Again at the 2nd Circuit
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250