In Dispute Over Koko's Companion, Judge Sides With Cincinnati Zoo
U.S. District Judge Richard Seeborg found that The Gorilla Foundation had agreed to let a third party decide where Ndume, a gorilla loaned to the organization by the zoo, would live after the death of Koko, the western lowland gorilla who famously learned sign language.
February 04, 2019 at 12:54 PM
4 minute read
A federal judge in San Francisco has sided with the Cincinnati Zoo in its dispute with a Bay Area nonprofit over the fate of longtime companion of Koko, the western lowland gorilla who famously learned sign language.
In a decision issued Friday, U.S. District Judge Richard Seeborg ordered The Gorilla Foundation, the Redwood City nonprofit that cared for Koko until her death in June 2018, to begin working with the zoo to arrange the transfer of Ndume, Koko's male companion.
The zoo loaned Ndume to the foundation nearly a quarter century ago in hopes that he and Koko would mate, but they never did. Seeborg ruled Friday that the foundation had entered into a valid agreement with the zoo prior to Koko's death to let an organization that oversees the well-being of captive gorillas in North America decide where Ndume should live in the case that he outlived Koko.
That organization has determined that Ndume should return to the zoo where he can interact with other gorillas. After Koko's death, he was the sole remaining gorilla housed at the foundation.
The foundation's lawyers at Casselman Law Group and Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy had argued that Ndume's age, 27 years of experience living under the foundation's care, and a dormant stomach infection would make any move a serious risk to the gorilla's health. But Seeborg concluded that the foundation was aware of those risks when it signed an updated agreement with the zoo in 2015.
Related story: Gorilla Foundation Moves to Sideline PETA in Fight Over Koko's Companion
“TGF's position is fatally undermined by the fact it made the agreement only three years ago, with full knowledge of the facts it now insists might give rise to unreasonable costs,” Seeborg wrote.
The judge, however, directed the zoo to entertain “in good faith” any suggestions the foundation has regarding Ndume's transfer and care.
“TGF, in turn, is to exercise the utmost good faith in presenting any suggestions or requests, and is directed to bear in mind that the question of whether Ndume will be transferred to the Zoo is no longer subject to negotiation,” the judge wrote.
Seeborg urged the parties to reach a consensus on the transfer noting that Ndume is “no ordinary chattel.”
“While the law recognizes that gorillas in captivity may be owned, neither the 2015 Agreement nor this order treats Ndume merely as property to be dealt according to the desires of the Zoo,” the judge wrote. He asked the parties to file a joint statement if they were at an impasse on any issues within 30 days of his Feb. 1 order.
Reached by email Monday, the foundation's lead lawyer, David Casselman of the Casselman Law Group, said his client is reviewing the situation and had no comment.
Counsel at Covington & Burling and Taft Stettinius & Hollister represent the zoo.
In a written statement, a spokesperson said that zoo was pleased that the judge was enforcing its agreement with the foundation as it is written.
“We look forward to working with The Gorilla Foundation to transfer Ndume to Cincinnati safely as soon as possible, so that he can once again live with other gorillas,” the spokesperson said.
Delcianna Winders, vice president and deputy general counsel of PETA, which filed an amicus brief backing the zoo in the case, issued a statement calling the ruling “a new life for Ndume the gorilla and … an official court declaration that an intelligent, sensitive gorilla is 'not ordinary chattel.' ”
“ We look to The Gorilla Foundation to follow the court's order and cooperate with the Cincinnati Zoo without delay so that Ndume can finally be supported by expert care and have the essential companionship of his fellow gorillas,” Winders said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPenn State Dickinson Law Dean Named President-Elect of Association of American Law Schools
With AI Research Clustered in Hot Spots, Left-Out Regions Could Become Economic 'Deserts'
5 minute readMorgan Lewis Grows ESG Group, Adding Legal VP of Fidelity Foundations
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250