Why the US Labor Dept. Is Dropping Its Google Pay-Data Appeal
The Labor Department's appeal had been pending for more than a year. Agency lawyers are pointing to a new Trump-era compliance directive that focuses on transparency and cooperation.
February 04, 2019 at 05:12 PM
4 minute read
The U.S. Labor Department has dropped its appeal seeking broad access to internal Google Inc. salary records, part of a federal compliance review looking at alleged pay disparities at the technology company.
The Labor Department had appealed an administrative law judge's 2017 ruling that said the demands for Google's workplace records were “over-broad, intrusive on employee privacy, unduly burdensome and insufficiently focused on obtaining the relevant information.”
Google was one of several major U.S. companies that would face the glare of the Labor Department Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, or OFCCP, at the end of the Obama administration. The Labor Department's appeal had been pending for more than a year.
“After careful consideration, OFCCP has decided to enforce the ALJ order and complete its compliance review on the merits consistent with the terms of its newly issued directives on transparency and predetermination notices,” Craig Leen, director of the compliance office, said in a statement. “OFCCP views this as the most effective means of reaching final resolution with Google.”
Google's lawyers at the law firm Jackson Lewis, including Lisa Sween, the San Francisco office managing principal, did not immediately comment Monday. A representative for Google declined to comment.
The Labor Department said it will seek to enforce the administrative law judge's order from July 2017. That order by the San Francisco judge granted the company some protection from giving its data to the agency.
Dropping the appeal, the Labor Department lawyers, led by former Kirkland & Ellis partner Kate O'Scannlain, said it would “complete its compliance review on the merits consistent with the terms of its newly issued directives on transparency and predetermination notices.”
The directive, issued in September under the agency's new Trump-era leaders, seeks to “facilitate consistency, improve efficiency and collaborative resolution, and also supports contractors' ability to conduct meaningful self-audits to proactively identify and address issues with their employment practices.”
Some management-side attorneys said the new push from the compliance office did not go far enough to alleviate business concerns. Still, the directives were largely viewed as a business-friendly approach to auditing contractors. An adverse finding against a contractor could imperil existing and future contracts.
The DOL's compliance review dates to 2015, when the agency asked the company to provide certain compensation records as part of a scheduled audit. Labor Department lawyers sued Google in January 2017. The head of the office at the time, Thomas Dowd, said then: “Despite many opportunities to produce the information voluntarily, Google has refused to do so.”
The Labor Department's filing is posted below:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWillkie Farr & Gallagher Drives Legal Challenge for Uber Against State's Rideshare Laws
5 minute readReport: US Attorney E. Martin Estrada to Resign From California's Central District
3 minute readAfter Solving Problems for Presidents, Ron Klain Now Applying Legal Prowess to Helping Airbnb Overturn NYC Ban
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Avantia Publicly Announces Agentic AI Platform Ava
- 2Shifting Sands: May a Court Properly Order the Sale of the Marital Residence During a Divorce’s Pendency?
- 3Joint Custody Awards in New York – The Current Rule
- 4Paul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Adds Capital Markets Attorney
- 5Chancery: Common Stock Worthless in 'Jacobson v. Akademos' and Transaction Was Entirely Fair
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250