SF Company Creates CLE Program Custom-Made for In-House Counsel
The program, called In-House Focus, features videos of mainly high-profile in-house counsel talking with their own outside counsel in an hourlong roundtable format.
February 05, 2019 at 09:00 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
A San Francisco company on Monday announced the launch of a continuing legal education program tailored to in-house counsel and underscoring diversity.
The program, called In-House Focus, features videos of mainly high-profile in-house counsel talking with their own outside counsel in an hourlong roundtable format. And for the most part, the presenters are women or people of color.
In one of the first recorded segments entitled “The Legal Intersection of Diversity and Technology,” Neal Suggs, vice president and deputy general counsel for Microsoft Corp., talks with Microsoft outside counsel Judy Jennison and Dominique Shelton Leipzig, both partners at Perkins Coie.
“When they reached out to me several months ago about doing a CLE, I said I would if I could do it the way I want to, rather than how they are usually done,” Suggs said. “I wanted to focus on what in-house counsel really need, not do a law school class.”
Suggs said there is a wide gap in the quality of CLE material because “some providers have taken advantage of the process as a money-making endeavor because we all need it to be licensed.”
Suggs' expertise is in cloud services, data privacy and ethics and compliance issues. His segment focused on the rapidly evolving nature of technology and the impact that change is having on business, the law and the workforce.
“I'm kind of excited about what they are trying to do with this platform,” Suggs said. “First, it was designed for mobile consumption. It's videotape; it's not a classroom setting nor a live-taped event. It's designed for in-house counsel. Outside counsel can consume it too, but it's unique for in-house counsel.”
Suggs said he did the segment without compensation, although he later accepted a role on the company's advisory board with a small stock stipend.
Company founder Andrew Dick said his goal was to produce dynamic and diverse legal content for the in-house community, delivered by industry leaders. “Their firsthand experience has credibility with our audience,” Dick said.
Dick said he also chose to “not just talk about diversity but to show it. This is a platform where law firms and companies can showcase their diverse talent. We might bring about some change in stereotypes, and it could open some doors.”
So far he has produced nine videotaped segments that are available to subscribers on the company website, www.inhousefocus.com. He hopes to have 100 segments by year's end.
He acknowledged that large companies often have law firms come into their offices to put on CLE classes for free but said smaller legal departments aren't offered those opportunities. “And all legal departments can benefit from an online, on-demand solution,” he added.
While there are other videotaped versions in the market, both Dick and Suggs said they do not offer the content or production quality of Dick's programs. Dick also said his goal is to price his product around 50 percent of the going market price.
Other segments now available include creating a company data privacy program with Jordan Kanfer, general counsel of NTT America; managing a multigenerational workforce with Danielle Hohos, deputy GC of Williams-Sonoma Inc.; legal partnering in merger and acquisition transactions with Sharon Underberg, former general counsel of Eastman Kodak Co.; handling cross-border investigations with Claudius Sokenu, deputy GC and head of litigation for Marathon Petroleum Corp.; and navigating an initial public offering with Alon Rotem, general counsel of thredUP.
Dick said major law firms also featured include DLA Piper; Goodwin Procter; Morgan, Lewis & Bockius; Norton Rose Fulbright; Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe; Seyfarth Shaw and Sullivan & Cromwell.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Trending Stories
- 1Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 2Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 3Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 4Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250