Boeing Sued Over Deadly California Wildfire
A new lawsuit blamed Boeing, along with Southern California Edison, for causing the Woolsey Fire, which scorched more than 100,000 acres in Southern California last fall.
February 07, 2019 at 06:50 PM
4 minute read
A new lawsuit alleges that The Boeing Co. was responsible for the deadly wildfire that ravaged Southern California last fall.
The suit, filed Tuesday in Los Angeles Superior Court, is the first to accuse Boeing of playing a role in the Woolsey Fire, which scorched more than 100,000 acres and killed three people in the Los Angeles area. The suit also names Southern California Edison and its parent corporation, Edison International, which face 18 other lawsuits over the Nov. 8 fire.
Boeing owns the Santa Susana Field Laboratory, former site of Rocketdyne, where the suit says California fire officials believe the Woolsey Fire started. The suit alleges that Boeing and Southern California Edison failed to maintain overhead electrical facilities on the property, and that Boeing did not “have an adequate fire-prevention program, or have adequately trained fire-suppression personnel in place.”
“There were issues with respect to vegetation and vegetation management, issues with the response of the fire unit they have there, and whether they were properly activated,” said Ronald Goldman of Los Angeles-based Baum, Hedlund, Aristei & Goldman, which filed the suit on behalf of more than 100 residents and business owners. “This is a high fire-prone area, and they've had valuable facilities out there for a long time.”
Also on the suit were Robert F. Kennedy Jr. of Kennedy & Madonna in Hurley, New York, and Brian Strange, of Los Angeles-based Strange & Butler. Kennedy teamed with Baum Hedlund on the first trial over Monsanto Co.'s Roundup, which ended with a $289 million verdict last year, and Strange personally fought off flames from the Woolsey Fire that threatened his own Malibu home.
Boeing denied the allegations.
“Security and fire personnel stationed at Santa Susana immediately responded when the fire was first reported and also promptly notified firefighting agencies,” wrote spokeswoman C.J. Nothum in an email. “Upon arrival, the county and municipal fire jurisdictions established incident command over the firefighting activities. Cal Fire [California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection] is conducting an investigation into the origins of the fire. The California Public Utilities Commission is also conducting an investigation. Boeing is fully cooperating with these investigations.”
Southern California Edison said, “At this time, SCE is not commenting on any lawsuits associated with the Woolsey Fire, as an ongoing investigation is underway by Cal Fire and Ventura County Fire. SCE is fully cooperating in their investigation.”
The suit, which seeks an unspecified amount of punitive damages against Edison and Boeing, comes as a Los Angeles Superior Court judge on Tuesday ordered 18 lawsuits over the Woolsey Fire to be coordinated before a single judge. It also comes as another utility, PG&E Corp., filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on Jan. 29, citing $30 billion in legal liabilities tied to wildfires that took place at the same time as the Woolsey Fire, but in Northern California. Those fires killed 85 people and charred 150,000 acres.
|
Read the full complaint here:
|
Related Stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Appropriate Relief'?: Google Offers Remedy Concessions in DOJ Antitrust Fight
4 minute read'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute read‘It's Your Funeral’: On Avoiding Damaging Your Client’s Case With Uncivil Behavior
Practice Tips From—and About—the New Judges on the Northern District of California Bench
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250