Data Breaches: A Decentralized Solution to a Typically Centralized Problem
It is only natural to centralize important data and documents. But the potential benefits of a decentralized means of storage cannot be underestimated.
February 07, 2019 at 04:15 PM
6 minute read
Data breaches never cease to grab headlines these days. In fact, we hear of them so often that the destruction they leave behind may not even make many of us flinch anymore. As long as the data is somebody else's, people might just choose to look the other way. But with more and more data breaches, the odds that somebody can continue to avoid the perils of data storage become ever more remote. The truth is, data breaches are a technological danger that the entire modern world faces, and the problem is only getting worse. State and federal lawmakers continue their attempts to address the vociferous claims of breach victims but struggle to keep up with the tactics of hackers. Suffice to say, the consequences of these breaches are becoming increasingly severe.
Additionally, data breach victims' information is varied and comes from all areas of life: there is patient data from hospitals and medical facilities; credit card and bank account holders' financial information; trade secrets; cellphone data; even identifying information and private messages of those cheating on their spouse. Okay, maybe the last one isn't the worst, but it accentuates the point: nobody is safe.
Some of the biggest problems with these breaches are the fundamental mechanisms by which the data is stored. For example, in many data breaches, the data is stored in a centralized location, perhaps on a third party's servers or a local drive. There are plenty of problems with centralized data storage, chief among them being that the labor and time necessary to collect the data for its unlawful removal during a breach is significantly reduced, since all the data is located in a specific and susceptible place. Comparatively speaking, it used to be harder for criminals to steal information. For example, they may have had to break into a business' central location and drag the filing cabinets into the back of their pickup truck. And if not hard, there was at least much less incentive, given the lack of stealth and the potential noise involved in maneuvering a metal filing cabinet out of a business's window or back door in the middle of the night, or trying to sneak away boxes upon boxes upon crates of a client's private information.
It is only natural to centralize important data and documents. The filing cabinet example illustrates that we have been doing it for years. It's just easier. No business wants to have to pull together pieces of a file located in five different storage locations across town or across the country. We all want to walk to the shelf and see the entire file there. With computer hard drive storage and even early cloud storage, this workplace tendency has generally remained intact. But computer and cloud storage also introduced the methods criminals use today to quite invisibly steal the data without anybody at your business knowing until it's too late (or maybe never knowing at all). Perhaps it's time for a decentralized approach.
The potential benefits of a decentralized means of storage cannot be underestimated. If the data is accessible by anybody on a network but encrypted and scattered across the network, it is not so easily the target of thieves. In this vein, the system is essentially taking the files in the filing cabinet and shooting the information on the pages inside it across the globe in every direction, simultaneously hiding the correct information behind code only decryptable by those on the network.
In many regards, this is what blockchain attempts to accomplish. Blockchain, a technology largely still in its infancy, has the potential to bring traditional data breach hackers to their knees. This could be great news for businesses, especially considering that blockchain also aims to make data storage cheaper, more consistent and more available. Some skeptics have become wary, associating blockchain with Bitcoin and the economic turmoil that has come with cryptocurrencies of late. However, while blockchain is indeed the technology underpinning cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, it has a bright future in data storage, accuracy and management, largely independent from Bitcoin's market issues. While there are nuances and caveats to any new technology, the potential here is great for the following reasons:
- Blockchain consists of technological “blocks” containing data or information, which are then essentially added on top of each other into a “chain.” The collective chain has unique properties, one of which is that the information on the chain is permanent and time-stamped. It is immutable, which is imperative to data storage.
- The blockchain network is composed of “nodes” that, in simple terms, act to validate the data through one of several consensus protocols that incentivize proving that the data is, among other things, nonmalicious. To add to the chain, the data typically must be accepted by a certain percentage of the network, thereby thwarting traditional breach attempts by rogue hackers.
- Blockchain technology also allows for the possibility of “smart contracts,” which are coded contracts that self-execute when the system recognizes that a predetermined set of criteria are met, which could be immensely useful to companies in the business of data transfer (such as banks, medical institutions, real estate firms, insurance companies and the like). A hacker attempting a data hack would, theoretically, be overruled by the consensus protocol, and the contract would not trigger.
Of course, decentralized platforms come with their own issues. Any blockchain or crypto enthusiast probably knows about the various types of attacks that can occur on decentralized networks in certain situations. There is also the issue of the scalability trilemma: that blockchain aims to render solutions for security, decentralization and scalability, but can only truly possess any two of the three properties at one time. With time will surely come solutions or alternatives to the original platforms with these types of problems, as blockchain has been resilient in its methods for resolving issues in the past.
Ultimately, when considering enterprise shifts in data protection, any modern business would be smart to consider the growing decentralized options for storage available to it, including blockchain-based options. There may be no greater data privacy tip in the present day than to educate your employees, and/or IT department and legal departments, on the advent and enterprise opportunities found in decentralized data storage platforms. Your company will surely be grateful for this in the future. Data protection is the gift that keeps on giving; whether that gift is for the data owners or the data hackers is a story still being written.
Chris C. Schwarz is an associate attorney at ADLI Law Group who focuses his practice on corporate, business transactions and civil litigation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBuchalter Hires Longtime Sheppard Mullin Real Estate Partner as Practice Chair
Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Holland & Knight Hires Former Davis Wright Tremaine Managing Partner in Seattle
3 minute readPaul Hastings Hires Music Industry Practice Chair From Willkie in Los Angeles
Trending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250