Yes, a Happier Practice of Law Is Possible!
A recent study found that of just under 13,000 practicing lawyers, approximately 28 percent were struggling with depression, 19 percent with anxiety, and 20 percent with problematic drinking. Law is a high stress job. But other careers are stressful and don't have such staggering statistics. Is stress the only piece of the puzzle, or is there something about lawyers in general?
February 08, 2019 at 04:56 PM
5 minute read
We all know the statistics on the mental health of lawyers are bleak. A recent study by the American Bar Association Commission on Lawyer Assistance Programs and the Hazelden Betty Ford Foundation found that of just under 13,000 practicing lawyers, approximately 28 percent were struggling with depression, 19 percent with anxiety, and 20 percent with problematic drinking.
Some may try to justify these numbers with the all too simple explanation: Law is a high stress job. But other careers are stressful and don't have such staggering statistics. Is stress the only piece of the puzzle, or is there something about lawyers in general?
When I first started looking into the topic of lawyer mental health, I found research showing a disturbing correlation: the same personality traits over represented in the population of adults recovering from mood and substance abuse disorders are common in lawyers. These traits include high achievement orientation, perfectionism, and pessimism.
Ironically, these traits often serve lawyers well. Pessimism when reviewing a contract can help us identify potential problems others might not see. Perfectionism and a high achievement orientation can lead us to review that brief one more time to catch each and every typo. Each trait is a double-edged sword. It might make us excellent at our jobs, but it is also correlates to mental health issues that can make us unhappy in life.
So what do we do with this information? Is there a way to not be miserable and be a great lawyer?
When I decided to enroll in a yoga teacher training, my goal was to improve my physical yoga practice and make sure my alignment for each pose was technically correct. During the training, we were asked to meditate as much as we could, ideally daily. What was first a challenge—making time each day in an already tight schedule takes determination—became a daily routine that led to increased happiness and a better perspective on events and the people in my life. I noticed my stress level significantly decreased, and I responded differently to stressful events. For example, an opposing counsel who I previously found completely obnoxious simply didn't get under my skin in the same way.
As it turns out, that experience isn't unique to me. There are scientific studies that show the human brain actually changes with a consistent practice of meditation, mindfulness, and/or yoga. There are also studies that show they help the brain function in ways beneficial to the practice of law. For example, one study showed that meditation leads to growth in areas of the brain important for learning, memory, emotional regulation, perspective taking, and compassion.
The evidence I find most compelling are two contrasting studies presented in a TEDx talk given by Dr. Sara Lazar, an assistant professor in psychology at Harvard Medical School, on how meditation and yoga changes our brains. In one study, scientists measured regular rodents' amygdalas (the fight or flight area of the brain). Then, they put these same normal rodents through a ten-day stress regimen, and remeasured the amygdala to find it had increased in size. Curiously, after the rodents were returned to their normal environment for three weeks, the amygdala was still enlarged and the rodents still exhibited stressful behaviors. For me, the takeaway is that it is fully possible our brains and their perception of fear don't immediately react to a positive change in environment. If we parallel this to our lives as lawyers, when we switch from the stressful environment of the office to home, our brain chemistry (and possibly enlarged amygdala) comes home with us.
The second study looked at people who had never meditated before. The scientists scanned their brains prior to and after an eight-week meditation-based stress reduction program where they were told to meditate every day for 30 to 40 minutes. The amygdala decreased in size in direct proportion to how much stress reduction the participants experienced. Thus, the improved feelings the participants self-reported was backed by neurobiological evidence.
I find it extremely meaningful nothing related to stress-producing events changed in the participants' lives. They didn't necessarily need a new job or to remove aggravating people from their lives to feel better. (And even if they did, I think the rodent study indicates that might not have helped reduce stress anyway.) The participants changed their perception and experience of stressors through meditation. If we parallel this to the practice of law, it means we can have stressful jobs with demanding clients without being miserable.
There are times where avoiding stress could be the answer. But completely avoiding difficult situations or stress is impossible. The achievement of any challenging goal comes with stress, and we shouldn't turn away from worthy pursuits just because they are hard. Instead, it's how we respond to stressors that will permit us to take on challenges and make us happier and more content in the long run. Meditation and yoga changes our brain, which changes the way we think and our relationship and response to stressors, which makes us not only happier lawyers, but happier humans.
Jennifer Cormano is an associate in Nixon Peabody's Los Angeles office. She represents health care providers, including hospitals, physician groups, academic medical centers, surgery centers, accountable care organizations and other organizations affiliated with the health care industry. https://www.nixonpeabody.com/en/team/cormano-jennifer-m
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Nothing Is Good for the Consumer Right Now': Experts Weigh Benefits, Drawbacks of Updated Real Estate Commission Policies
FTC Issues Final Rule Banning Most Noncompetes, but Immediate Legal Challenges Ensue
6 minute readCalif. Employers On Tight Deadline to Comply With New Workplace Violence Prevention Law
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250