Wells Fargo: California, Pacific Northwest Firms Lead Growth in 2018
Big firms in California and the Pacific Northwest were industry leaders in revenue and net income growth last year, according to a recent Wells Fargo survey.
February 11, 2019 at 03:23 PM
4 minute read
Law firms in California and the Pacific Northwest flourished last year thanks to strong demand, reporting the highest 2018 revenue growth among nine regions surveyed in a recent report.
According to a year-end check-in survey conducted by the Wells Fargo Legal Specialty Group, law firms based in Northern California and the Pacific Northwest experienced revenue growth of 7.4 percent from 2017 to 2018. Following close behind, Southern California law firms saw revenue growth of 7 percent, said Wells Fargo Legal Specialty Group senior director of sales Joe Mendola, which was second highest among the regions surveyed.
Both groups of firms exceeded industrywide growth of 5.9 percent, said Mendola.
However, in terms of profits per equity partner (PEP), the two West-Coast regions reported divergent results. Firms in Northern California and the Pacific Northwest reported a 12.4 percent increase in PEP last year, while Southern California law firms said their PEP was only up by 4.6 percent—far below the overall national average of 8.1 percent.
“The explanation for that [is] we don't ask the firms to provide us the change in head counts,” said Mendola. “However, when your net income is up by 7.5 percent and your profit per equity partner is [up] 4.7 percent, clearly the denominator increased—the number of equity partners in the region increased—and that diluted the income growth.”
Net income growth for Northern California and Pacific Northwest firms was up by 11.8 percent. Meanwhile, Southern California firms grew net income 7.5 percent, almost equivalent to the overall industry average of 7.6 percent.
In the two West Coast regions, 25 law firms—14 in Southern California and 11 in Northern California and the Pacific Northwest—participated in the survey.
“A lot of the larger firms, their expenses were impacted by the associate salary increase that occurred,” said Mendola, explaining the lower net income growth in Southern California. “When you think of Southern California, there are a large number of Am Law 100 firms that would have fallen into that bucket.”
Demand growth in both regions was above the industry average of 2.3 percent. In the North, firms saw demand increase by 4.1 percent, and in the South, demand grew by 3.2 percent.
“If you look at California in totality as a region, the performance was really strong and it looks like that trend will continue based on the inventory level,” said Mendola, “at least into the early part of 2019.”
Firms' inventory—representing total accounts receivable and unpaid time—was up by 10 percent in Southern California last year. Meanwhile, Northern California and the Pacific Northwest region saw its inventory grow by 8.9 percent in 2018.
Looking ahead to 2019, Mendola said firms in Northern California are forecasting revenue growth of 4.5 percent, while Southern California firms have a less optimistic forecast of 2.5-percent growth. Nationally, the 150 law firms Wells Fargo surveyed forecast revenue growth at 4.4 percent.
Nationwide, billing rates increased steadily in the 4 to 6 percent range last year, Mendola noted. In the year ahead, Northern California and Pacific Northwest firms expect rate increases of 4.7 percent, while firms in Southern California forecast a 4.8-percent increase in billing rates.
“There is a lag in terms of how a recession would impact the results,” said Mendola. He explained that law firms in both regions are predicting a lower revenue growth next year because they are paying close attention to a number of unsettling factors, including stock market fluctuations, interest rate volatility, international trade policies and Brexit.
“All of which are going to impact the sentiment people have to do business and do deals,” he added.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTikTok Hit With California Class Action for Allegedly Mining Children's Data Without Parental Consent
Khan Defends FTC Tenure, Does Not Address Post-Inauguration Plans
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250