Citi: In a Strong 2018, California Firms Won Top-Line Race
Law firms in California reported strong revenue growth in 2018, as well as above-average expenses, a recent survey by Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group found.
February 13, 2019 at 01:10 PM
4 minute read
Law firms based in California delivered the strongest revenue growth in 2018, with Southern California firms specifically showing the greatest top-line increases among all U.S. regions, a recent report from Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group showed.
Southern California-based firms saw revenue growth accelerate to 8.8 percent, the highest rate of all 11 geographic regions analyzed, said John Wilmouth, a senior client adviser in Citi's law firm group. And Northern California firms were close behind, showing revenue growth of 8.4 percent, the second highest rate among regions surveyed.
“I think a lot of that is due to the fact that they added a lot of lawyers,” Wilmouth said.
Both California regions' revenue results exceeded the industrywide average of 6.4 percent. That industrywide number showed improvement from the 4.5 percent revenue growth seen across industry in 2017.
Law firms in both regions also lapped the industry average for demand growth, which was 2.3 percent among all firms surveyed.
Demand at Southern California firms increased by 5.9 percent, which was the highest among all regions, according to Wilmouth. Meanwhile, in Northern California, demand was up 4.6 percent, coming in third among all regions. In 2017, Northern California firms led the industry for demand growth.
To Wilmouth's point about the addition of lawyers at these firms, total lawyer head count in Northern California rose by 3.8 percent in 2018, and in Southern California it was up by 3.3 percent. Both exceeded the national average head count growth, which was 1.4 percent last year—slightly less than the 1.9 percent increase in lawyers in 2017.
“Even though they were adding lawyers, they improved productivity,” said Wilmouth, of the California firms. Typically, when firms hire more lawyers, if the demand doesn't keep up, productivity decreases.
Nationally, law firms saw productivity improve by 1 percent—the first improvement since 2014, according to Citi. Northern California saw productivity improve by 1.1 percent, and Southern California watched it increase by 2.2 percent last year.
However, when it came to billing rates, both regions reported smaller increases in 2018 than in 2017. Firms in Northern California posted a 3.7 percent increase in 2018, while Southern California firms raised rates by 4.3 percent on average. Nationally, lawyer billing rates were up 4.3 percent, compared to a 3.7 percent increase in 2017.
While their top-line growth outpaced the industry, California firms also had higher expense growth than in other regions. Northern California firms saw their expenses grow by 7.1 percent last year, and Southern California firms experienced a 9.2 percent increase, both exceeding the industry average of 6.1 percent expense growth.
“Because they added so many lawyers, their expenses were very high,” Wilmouth said.
To match its high expenses, the Southern California region saw its profits per equity partner (PEP) growth, at 6 percent, lag behind the industry average of 7.5 percent. Northern California, however, saw PEP increase by 9 percent, coming in ahead of the industrywide amount despite above-average expense growth.
Year-end inventory continues to surge for both regions. In Northern California inventory growth was 9.6 percent, while Southern California firms saw inventory increase by 10.1 percent over 2017, Citi found. Industrywide, firms experienced inventory growth of 7.1 percent.
Citi's survey participants industrywide were 190 law firms of varying sizes—44 Am Law 50 firms, 35 Am Law 51-100 firms, 51 Am Law Second Hundred firms and 60 others, which include boutique and niche firms. In California, a total of 27 firms responded to the survey, including 11 firms based in Northern California and 16 firms based in Southern California.
Among all the California firms, eight were boutiques. Six of the eight boutique firms reported revenue growth last year, Wilmouth added.
“The entire country all the regions actually, for the most part, had a pretty good year this year,” Wilmouth said. “Texas is the only one that really struggled a lot in terms of revenue growth,” he added.
|Read more
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHueston Hennigan Secures Dismissal of SEC Action Against Ex-PwC Auditor in Mattel-Linked Case
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250