Who Is Tesla's New GC? Here's What Colleagues Had to Say
Jonathan Chang is the new general counsel of Tesla Inc. after eight years with the company. Those who have worked with Chang say he's the "perfect fit."
February 20, 2019 at 02:41 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Tesla Inc. drove off with a new general counsel Wednesday, promoting its vice president of legal, Jonathan Chang, to the top lawyer role to replace a D.C. litigator who only held the position for two months.
Chang joined Palo Alto-based Tesla as senior counsel in 2011. He's worked his way up the legal department, most recently managing Tesla's corporate securities, mergers and acquisitions, real estate, compliance, and sales and distribution functions in the U.S. and Europe. He'll now lead Tesla's global legal and policy teams and report to Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk.
Those who have worked with Chang said they weren't surprised by his appointment.
“I always thought that he was the right candidate to be the next GC,” said Phuong Phillips, the general counsel of Zynga Inc.
Phillips reported to Chang when she was Tesla's associate general counsel in 2017. The two also worked together during Tesla's acquisition of Phillips' former employer, SolarCity.
She said Chang managed most of the legal department during her time at Tesla. He was the one person who “touched a little bit of everything,” she said. A Tesla representative confirmed Chang “has managed most parts of the legal organization during his tenure.”
“A lot of people would have told you that they felt Jonathan was the leader of the group,” Phillips said. “He is a very kind soul and he cares a lot about his employees. I think that's why people looked up to him so much and turned to him for advice. … He was so good at making people feel stable and comfortable in their role and always trying to find ways to help them grow as individuals.”
Phil Rothenberg, the general counsel of Sonder who worked with Chang at Tesla for seven years, said he was excited for his former colleague. Rothenberg called him a “proven leader” at Tesla, noting Chang's key role in Tesla acquiring SolarCity and paying off a loan from the Department of Energy several years early. He and Chang co-led Tesla's legal team during a previous GC replacement search, he said.
“Jonathan is not only smart and well-qualified, he's been in the legal department since April 2011, coming up on eight years, and has worked with almost every different executive at the company,” Rothenberg said. “He's been there, he's seen it and he's succeeded. So I think it's a great choice.”
Tesla consultants emphasized Chang's passion for the company's mission and involvement in all aspects of its legal matters.
Bea González, a partner at consulting firm Capital Results who has handled multistate public affairs and legislative matters for Tesla for seven years, described Chang as strategic, positive, sincere and well versed in state and federal laws.
“He's so knowledgeable about the culture and the people at Tesla,” González said. “I think he's kind of a perfect fit. He's been there for a long time, he knows all the aspects of the business.”
She and Chang have worked closely on state legislative issues in Virginia, where González is based. A Tesla representative said Chang led Tesla's efforts to make cars available in more U.S. states by challenging state laws that prevent car manufacturers from directly selling or distributing cars.
Jason Tai, the principal at Tai Ginsberg & Associates and another Tesla consultant, also mentioned Chang's involvement in state-level issues and federal, real estate and M&A issues.
“He's really just everywhere,” Tai said. “I don't know how he gets any sleep, frankly.”
Tai added Chang's appointment as GC is “a natural evolution” for a Tesla in-house lawyer “who is much beloved, who people really respect.”
It's also an appointment that could bring stability to the company's legal team, Rothenberg said. Chang replaces Dane Butswinkas as GC, a litigation lawyer who joined Tesla just two months ago from D.C.'s Williams & Connolly. Butswinkas now plans to resume practicing at the firm. Tesla declined to comment on why Butswinkas was hired in December to run its legal department over Chang.
The legal leadership shake-up comes not long after Tesla settled charges with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission over controversial tweets from Musk.
“Not only is he well-qualified, he brings stability. I think it will be a sigh of relief for people in the know, such as people in the legal department at Tesla and others in management at Tesla,” Rothenberg said. “Because he is a known entity and you're not sure what you're going to get from the outside.”
Before joining Tesla, Chang held a general counsel role at Lithium Technologies in Emeryville, California, according to his LinkedIn profile. He started his legal career as a corporate attorney at Latham & Watkins after earning a law degree from the University of Southern California.
Chang did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGoogle Fails to Secure Long-Term Stay of Order Requiring It to Open App Store to Rivals
'Building Guardrails': Adobe's AGC on Legal's Responsibility in Generative AI
8 minute read'Inspirational Leaders Are Vulnerable': How Humble Upbringing Shaped Meta Lawyer's Priorities
7 minute readLife After General Counsel to CEO: Chelsea Grayson's Unique Path to Success
17 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250