Companies Could Face Stricter Data Breach Disclosure Requirements Under California Proposal
Companies collecting Californians' data could soon be required to notify residents of breaches exposing their passport numbers, green card numbers and biometric information.
February 21, 2019 at 10:44 PM
3 minute read
Companies collecting California residents' information could face tighter breach disclosure rules under a new proposal that would expand the definition of personally identifiable data in the state.
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra announced proposed legislation Thursday that would increase California's data breach notification law. If AB 1130 passes, California's definition of personally identifiable data would grow to include government-issued passports and green card numbers and biometric information, including fingerprints and retina scans.
“Recognize you're asking people to turn over to you, as a company, some really precious information and valuable information. If you were to lose someone's jewels or safety deposit box stashed with cash, you've got a responsibility to make that person whole, having lost that valuable personal property,” Becerra said. “Personal data is no different. Maybe even more precious. Some might say priceless. So we hope the message to companies is: use every tool at your disposal to protect this very precious information.”
California already has some of the strictest data breach laws in the U.S. It became the first U.S. state to enact a data breach law in 2003. Under California's current rules, companies must notify state residents if their driver's license number, Social Security number, credit card number, health or banking information is breached.
But Becerra said the omission of other government-issued and biometric information provides a “loophole” in the law that the new bill aims to close. He pointed to a 2018 breach at the Starwood hotel chain, owned by Marriott International Inc., which exposed the unencrypted passport numbers of around 5 million people.
The breach ”underscores the importance of protecting passport numbers,” he said, because current law wouldn't require Starwood to disclose that aspect of the breach to impacted California residents.
“When we're trying to encourage businesses and Californians as consumers to engage in business where there is trust, that disclosure of the breach is something that should be coming with an apology for a breakdown in that trust,” said Marc Levine, a member of the California State Assembly who joined Becerra in announcing AB 1130 Thursday. “Customers should feel when they're working with a business that their information should be secure. Because their personally identifiable information has incredible value.”
Becerra did not offer a timeline for the proposed changes. Companies collecting California residents' data also have less than a year to comply with the California Consumer Privacy Act, the first data protection act passed in a U.S. state.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCollectible Maker Funko Wins Motion to Dismiss Securities Class Action
How Tony West Used Transparency to Reform Uber's Toxic Culture
What Paul Grewal Has Learned About Advocacy as Coinbase's Top Lawyer
7 minute readShowered With Stock, Tech GCs Incentivized to 'Knock It Out of the Park'
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250