Companies Could Face Stricter Data Breach Disclosure Requirements Under California Proposal
Companies collecting Californians' data could soon be required to notify residents of breaches exposing their passport numbers, green card numbers and biometric information.
February 21, 2019 at 10:44 PM
3 minute read
Companies collecting California residents' information could face tighter breach disclosure rules under a new proposal that would expand the definition of personally identifiable data in the state.
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra announced proposed legislation Thursday that would increase California's data breach notification law. If AB 1130 passes, California's definition of personally identifiable data would grow to include government-issued passports and green card numbers and biometric information, including fingerprints and retina scans.
“Recognize you're asking people to turn over to you, as a company, some really precious information and valuable information. If you were to lose someone's jewels or safety deposit box stashed with cash, you've got a responsibility to make that person whole, having lost that valuable personal property,” Becerra said. “Personal data is no different. Maybe even more precious. Some might say priceless. So we hope the message to companies is: use every tool at your disposal to protect this very precious information.”
California already has some of the strictest data breach laws in the U.S. It became the first U.S. state to enact a data breach law in 2003. Under California's current rules, companies must notify state residents if their driver's license number, Social Security number, credit card number, health or banking information is breached.
But Becerra said the omission of other government-issued and biometric information provides a “loophole” in the law that the new bill aims to close. He pointed to a 2018 breach at the Starwood hotel chain, owned by Marriott International Inc., which exposed the unencrypted passport numbers of around 5 million people.
The breach ”underscores the importance of protecting passport numbers,” he said, because current law wouldn't require Starwood to disclose that aspect of the breach to impacted California residents.
“When we're trying to encourage businesses and Californians as consumers to engage in business where there is trust, that disclosure of the breach is something that should be coming with an apology for a breakdown in that trust,” said Marc Levine, a member of the California State Assembly who joined Becerra in announcing AB 1130 Thursday. “Customers should feel when they're working with a business that their information should be secure. Because their personally identifiable information has incredible value.”
Becerra did not offer a timeline for the proposed changes. Companies collecting California residents' data also have less than a year to comply with the California Consumer Privacy Act, the first data protection act passed in a U.S. state.
Read More:
Marriott Guests, Both Lawyers, File First Class Action Over Data Breach
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKraken’s Chief Legal Officer Exits, Eyes Role in Trump Administration
3 minute readCollectible Maker Funko Wins Motion to Dismiss Securities Class Action
How Tony West Used Transparency to Reform Uber's Toxic Culture
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250