Dissecting 'Firm Culture'—What This Term Means for Millennials
Promoting a positive “firm culture” can be of benefit to all employees, millennial or otherwise, and create an environment for better communication and efficiency across the workforce.
February 21, 2019 at 07:32 PM
5 minute read
Most lawyers are familiar with the catch-all term “firm culture,” and the related term “collegial work environment.” These phrases, which appear in nearly every firm's marketing materials, are used to convey that attorneys at that firm are happy. Individuals within firms, however, can often have vastly different perceptions of their work environment depending on a variety of factors, including the individual's own personality, the geographic location of the firm, the size of the firm, and the dynamic of a particular department or practice group, among many other factors. Given these variances, what does the term “firm culture” mean in practicality?
The term “culture” refers generally to the shared values, practices, and beliefs held by a group of individuals in society. Business organizations similarly have certain shared values, practices, and beliefs, which manifest in two separate but interconnected ways: first, the express policies and expectations conveyed by the partnership; and second, the subjective execution of unwritten shared values by individuals with power to set expectations.
Firm culture can be important for many reasons. It is in the best interest of firms to recruit and retain high-caliber attorneys who fit synergistically within the organization. Further, individuals who feel at home in their work environment may be happier, healthier, and more inclined to produce high-quality work product. Both of these factors can and do affect morale, and ultimately, the firm's bottom line.
For millennial attorneys in particular, work environment or culture can be a dispositive factor in whether to join or stay at a firm long term. Some studies have indicated that millennials across a spectrum of industries would be willing to forego nearly $10,000 in annual salary for a better work environment. Indeed, millennials do not shy away from leaving lucrative positions to seek other career opportunities that may better align with their personal and professional goals. Some publications estimate that by age 35, at least a quarter of all millennials will have held five full-time jobs. Many of these moves by millennials across organizations are prompted by factors other than salary alone.
The values millennials have come to appreciate, and in fact, expect, in professional settings often align with factors that can be associated with a positive “firm culture.” As Chambers and Associates has recognized, factors contributing to a positive “firm culture” may include: work-life blend, opportunity for early and substantive work for meaningful cases, training and mentorship, management and communication, feedback and praise, transparency regarding the business, social responsibility, diversity, and emphasis on team work. Similarly, many millennials seek to contribute positively, both in career and society, which means a greater expectation for substantive opportunity as well as an emphasis on pro bono work and volunteer opportunities. Millennials understand that providing high-quality work product is important, but are often unwilling to sacrifice their mental or physical health to do it. They strive to achieve work-life blend. Although millennials seek to work collaboratively rather than hierarchically, they appreciate the benefits of mentorship and guidance.
A majority of these factors can and often are addressed through the express policies and guidance offered by the partnership. These may include, for example, allowances for pro bono work to count as billable hours, flexible work policies with respect to face time or vacation, commitments to increase recruitment and retention of diverse candidates, formalized training or mentorship programs, and standardized annual reviews. All of these values can be expressly conveyed through the policies set by the partnership and can contribute to a perception of a positive “firm culture.”
Some factors, such as management and communication, among others, are more subjective and essentially encompass questions of empathy and social responsibility as carried out by individuals who have the ability to set expectations on behalf of the firm. Are such individuals at the firm genuinely invested in the growth and development of attorneys more than self-promotion? How does the firm handle disputes between two individuals of unequal power? Do individuals at the firm merely pay lip service to stated values such as diversity, or are those values brought to life in meaningful ways on a daily basis? When promoting these more subjective values, a firm is only as strong as the individuals it has recruited at managerial levels.
At its core, a positive “firm culture” can be boiled down to the following: Everyone likes to feel valued and part of a larger, important whole; no one likes to feel dispensable or like a cog on a wheel. Promoting a positive “firm culture” can be of benefit to all employees, millennial or otherwise, and create an environment for better communication and efficiency across the workforce.
Shilpa Coorg is an associate at Winston & Strawn in Los Angeles. She focuses her practice on patent litigation, including pharmaceutical litigation under Hatch-Waxman. She represents and advises industry leaders on intellectual property matters across a broad spectrum of technologies.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Nothing Is Good for the Consumer Right Now': Experts Weigh Benefits, Drawbacks of Updated Real Estate Commission Policies
FTC Issues Final Rule Banning Most Noncompetes, but Immediate Legal Challenges Ensue
6 minute readCalif. Employers On Tight Deadline to Comply With New Workplace Violence Prevention Law
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250