'We Must Speak Out': California Lawyers Join Hundreds in New Group Criticizing Trump
The new group, called Lawyers Defending American Democracy, bills itself as nonpartisan. Numerous Big Law partners, former judges, professors and others in the law signed an open letter.
February 21, 2019 at 05:02 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
More than 200 lawyers have formed a new legal advocacy group challenging what they call the erosion of the rule of law under the presidency of Donald Trump.
“We, as lawyers, cannot ignore or remain silent about President Donald Trump's disregard of these core values and principles. We must speak out,” the lawyers wrote in an open letter that was distributed Thursday.
The new group, called Lawyers Defending American Democracy, bills itself as nonpartisan. The signers of the open letter include numerous Big Law partners across the country, law professors, former federal and state judges, and others. The group is led by Scott Harshbarger, a former Massachusetts state attorney general and now senior counsel in Boston at Casner & Edwards.
Among the lawyers who signed the letter: Jon Bouker, co-leader of the government relations practice at Arent Fox; Stanley McDermott III, a DLA Piper partner in New York; Robert Dell, retired global chair of Latham & Watkins; Emanuel Rouvelas, a partner at K&L Gates in Washington; William Meserve, a retired Ropes & Gray partner; retired Covington & Burling partner Jonathan Blake; Hogan Lovells senior counsel Kathy Weinman in Boston; Stanley Twardy Jr., a Day Pitney partner in Connecticut; and Robert Skinner, a Ropes & Gray partner in Boston. Robert Saudek in Atlanta, a retired managing partner of Morris, Manning & Martin, also signed the letter, as did Ralph Levy, a retired King & Spalding partner in Atlanta.
Donald Stern, a managing director at the compliance monitoring firm Affiliated Monitors Inc. and a former U.S. attorney for Massachusetts, also signed the letter. Among the former judges were: A. Howard Matz, who served on the Los Angeles trial bench and who's now senior counsel at Bird Marella; and Eric Younger, who served on the California Superior Court in Los Angeles.
Atop the list of signatories is a disclaimer that states: “Organizational affiliation is listed solely for identification purposes. Our views are not attributable to any organization with which we may be affiliated.”
The group paints itself as nonpartisan and focused on defending “fundamental principles and norms of American democracy,” such as an independent press and the expectation of honesty from public officials. The group urged Trump to “respect and honor” the independence of the federal judiciary and law enforcement, parts of government he has been known to publicly pressure through tweets and other means.
Trump has faced criticism over his remarks about judges and court rulings. In November, delivering a rare public rebuke, Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. said in a response to remarks from Trump: “We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges. What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them. That independent judiciary is something we should all be thankful for.”
The new legal group isn't the first to materialize in opposition to some of the statements and positions of the Trump administration. Last November, a new conservative lawyers' group called Checks and Balances emerged. The group's mission statement also spoke about upholding the rule of law, and addressed “the power of truth.”
There can be professional risks for lawyers attaching their names to letters that are adverse to the Trump administration.
The U.S. Commerce Department last year rescinded its offer to Covington partner Peter Lichtenbaum to serve in a highly visible compliance monitor role after learning he was among the lawyers and former government officials who'd signed a “Never Trump” letter in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election. Secretary Wilbur Ross gave the ZTE Corp. monitorship to Barnes & Thornburg partner Roscoe Howard, a former U.S. attorney in Washington, D.C.
A lawyer who had followed the Commerce Department's decision to rescind the offer to Lichtenbaum told the NLJ recently that the move “on its face is a clear violation of the First Amendment.” The agency declined to comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'We Are Prepared to Fight': Governor Calls Special Session to Fund Legal Attacks on Trump Policies
4 minute readWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250