Facebook Sues Ukrainian Duo Over Malicious Apps
The two men are accused of making apps styled as horoscopes and tests to scrape users' social media data.
March 11, 2019 at 03:54 PM
3 minute read
Facebook has sued a pair of Ukrainian men for developing and operating applications stylized as horoscopes and quizzes that illegally lifted users' data.
The federal lawsuit, filed Friday in the Northern District of California, alleges Gleb Sluchevsky and Andrey Gorbachov were behind web applications that tricked users into installing “malicious” web extensions that allowed the defendants to scrape data from users' social media profiles, and to place advertisements in their news feeds.
Through their work, which lasted from 2016 up until late last year, the defendants affected about 63,000 browsers visited by Facebook users, the complaint said. The company, which is seeking damages, says it took a $75,000 hit investigating and addressing the defendants' acts.
The lawsuit represents Facebook's latest legal effort to target foreigners. The social media giant recently targeted Chinese companies for selling fake Facebook and Instagram accounts. The social media giant has also faced intense public scrutiny over the handling of its users' data.
Friday's complaint said the Ukrainians' work “interfered with and undermined Facebook's relationship with its users,” adding that they “directly and proximately caused and continue to cause irreparable harm and injury” to the site.
The defendants began their operation in 2016 by using aliases to create Facebook accounts and register as web application developers, according to the lawsuit. They ran at least four applications, which were available on publicly accessible websites and targeted mostly Russian and Ukrainian speakers. The apps claimed to offer horoscopes, and character and popularity assessments, according to the complaint.
Users who logged into the apps using Facebook were told they were giving access to a limited amount of their public profile information, according to the complaint.
“In fact, Defendants knew that the applications were designed to scrape the app users' public profiles on Facebook and other social networking sites, and to prompt users to install malicious extensions for the purpose of manipulating the users' browsers and collect the users' private and non-publicly viewable lists of friends when the app user visited the Facebook site,” according to the complaint.
The lawsuit claims the developers violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, and California law.
Facebook said it disabled the men's known accounts last October. The social media site said in its complaint that it publicly announced it had concluded an investigation into the extensions, contacted law enforcement, and told users how to uninstall the extensions. It said it also contacted browser makers to ensure the extensions were no longer available.
Lawyers from Tucker Ellis, including partners David Steele, Howard Kroll, and Steven Lauridsen, are representing Facebook. Tucker Ellis also represents Facebook in its suit filed against the Chinese companies last week.
One of the lawyers referred questions to Facebook's press office, which did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Also signed onto the complaint are Jessica Romero, Michael Chmelar, and Stacy Chen, who are identified as attorneys at Facebook.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
New Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
Stock Trading App Robinhood Hit With Privacy Class Action 1 Month After Alleged Data Breach
'Water Cooler Discussions': US Judge Questions DOJ Request in Google Search Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250