Women Corporate Counsel Share Career Advice, Experiences At Berkeley Law Event
Women partners and general counsel convened for a panel Friday on gender equity in business law, offering career advice and their own stories.
March 15, 2019 at 06:59 PM
4 minute read
The Berkeley Center for Law and Business kicked off a series addressing gender inequity in business law with a panel of corporate counsel in San Francisco on Friday.
Phuong Phillips, the general counsel of gaming company Zynga; Priya Pai, the incoming general counsel of Even Responsible Finance; Samantha Good, a partner at Kirkland & Ellis; and Katharine Martin, a partner and chair of the board at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati discussed women in business law on a panel hosted by Startup@Berkeley Law director Deborah Kang.
The lawyers discussed the challenges—and advantages—for women in business law. Good said there is a power that comes with being the only woman in the room: she stands out. Panelists said they have all been in that situation and found ways to thrive.
“My entire career I've always been the only woman in the room,” Phillips said, “The reason why I never felt intimidated: I saw myself as a peer to them. Gain the confidence. Gain the knowledge. Be prepared when you go into a meeting. And if that doesn't work, the other thing that has worked is, I'll find an advocate in the group.”
Pai also said she looks for advocates, and she does so by playing to her strengths. Instead of waiting to launch new ideas in the boardroom in a large groups, she bounces her proposals off of other executives in one-on-one meetings, where, she said, she's “more effective.”
That strategy allows her to grow her ideas in an authentic way. And, she said, it gives her an idea of how each executive will react to her idea when she brings it up in a larger meeting, as she's already discussed with them individually.
“I knew who was going to be behind it and who wasn't and how to address that,” she said. “So that comes back to, doing your homework and being being prepared, but also getting your advocates in the room.”
Advocates, sponsors and mentors also matter when women lawyers want to transition to a new role. Yet panelists said women are more likely to shy away from growing their networks, or tapping into the ones they have.
Martin said lawyers need to “figure out what we're the most comfortable with” when it comes to networking. All four panelists, and host Kang, said they've been overwhelmed by large networking events before. Phillips suggested lawyers looking to connect reach out via LinkedIn with a personal note after meeting in person; Martin said she often asks people to meet over lunch.
There are also ways to grow larger networking communities authentically, Pai said. She noted her friend began inviting women she met in fintech over for group dinners. In a small amount of time, the group has grown to more than 50 women in the industry.
“I think networking at that level, where it's actually more about friends and community, is really powerful,” Pai said.
Martin added women shouldn't be afraid to use those networks to develop business—the worst case scenario, she said, is someone politely says no.
Friday's session, titled “Lessons Learned: Career Perspectives from Legal Leaders,” was the first in a series hosted by The Women in Business Law Initiative at the Berkeley Center for Law and Business, which aims to address gender inequity in the legal industry. The initiative's next session June 7 will focus on addressing recruiting and integrating diverse talent.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCollectible Maker Funko Wins Motion to Dismiss Securities Class Action
How Tony West Used Transparency to Reform Uber's Toxic Culture
What Paul Grewal Has Learned About Advocacy as Coinbase's Top Lawyer
7 minute readShowered With Stock, Tech GCs Incentivized to 'Knock It Out of the Park'
Trending Stories
- 1Legaltech Rundown: LexisNexis Releases Lexis+ AI Mobile App, Hotshot Launches New M&A Training Simulation, and More
- 2Perkins Coie Boasts Diverse Partner Class
- 3NY Judge Indefinitely Delays Sentencing in Trump Hush Money Case
- 4US Supreme Court Tries to Define a 'Crime of Violence'
- 5How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'Think About Why You Want the Role, Because It Is Not an Easy Job,' Says Aaron Rubin of Morrison Foerster
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250