Facebook Agrees to Change Ad Platform to Settle Discrimination Claims
As a result of the settlement, anyone seeking to place housing, employment or credit ads on Facebook will no longer be allowed to target consumers based on their age, gender or ZIP code.
March 19, 2019 at 03:21 PM
5 minute read
In a settlement with civil rights and labor groups, Facebook Inc. announced sweeping changes to its ad platform Tuesday to resolve claims that advertisers for housing, employment and credit opportunities targeted the website's audiences in a discriminatory basis.
The social media giant announced the settlement Tuesday, rolling out changes to how it manages housing, employment and credit ads on its website. The settlement, which will prohibit advertisers from excluding users on a discriminatory basis, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Facebook reached the settlement after it faced mounting legal pressure from a coalition of civil rights and labor groups and plaintiffs firms. Facebook agreed to work with the groups to monitor implementation of the changes.
The settlement came together after months of negotiations, which began in the spring of 2017 and will resolve at least five lawsuits filed by groups including the American Civil Liberties Union, Communications Workers of America, and the National Fair Housing Alliance.
“Today's changes mark an important step in our broader effort to prevent discrimination and promote fairness and inclusion on Facebook. But our work is far from over,” said Facebook chief operating officer Sheryl Sandberg in a statement.
Facebook's key structural change will be creating a separate portal for advertisers hoping to publish housing, employment, credit advertisements, or HEC, on Facebook, Instagram or Messenger. The tech giant will significantly limit those advertisers' targeting options, eliminating their ability to select audiences based on gender, age, race, religion and sexual orientation. Advertisers will be barred from targeting other groups who are protected under federal, state or local laws.
The platform has also agreed to eliminate ZIP code targeting and will establish a minimum geographic radius of 15 miles from a specific address or the center of a city.
The targeting options will go “down from tens of thousands to just a few hundred,” Galen Sherwin, an ACLU attorney, said during a press call.
Under these changes, advertisers will be asked at the outset to self-certify whether they're HEC ad creators. If they are, then they will work through the HEC portal, which will limit their set of targeting options. If Facebook detects an HEC advertiser has tried to evade that portal, then the platform will block the advertisement and re-route them to the HEC portal.
Facebook also will begin requiring advertisers to certify their compliance with anti-discrimination laws and Facebook's own anti-discrimination policies, Sherwin said.
The National Fair Housing Alliance is represented by New York-based civil rights firm Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady. The Communication Workers of America and several individual job-seekers are represented by Outten & Golden and the ACLU.
As part of the deal, Facebook will pay nearly $3 million to CWA to reimburse its legal fees and costs and to the individual who alleged they were denied opportunities on Facebook's ad platform.
Facebook also agreed to pay the NFHA up to $1,950,000, in damages and attorneys' fees.
|'Wonderful Settlement'
Facebook has faced scrutiny over its ads since ProPublica first published a story in October 2016 that detailed how the company had allowed advertisers to target users based on race. ProPublica showed that it was possible to purchase housing-related advertisements and target them for certain races, excluding Facebook users with certain “ethnic affinities.”
Facebook was subsequently hit with at least five discrimination lawsuits or charges filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission between 2016 and 2018. Attorneys at the Aqua Terra Aeris Law Group and the Law Office of William Most led the way with a lawsuit in the Northern District of California in 2016, representing plaintiffs who said Facebook had allowed ad-purchasers to discriminate against racial minorities.
Outten Golden was brought onto the suit later in 2016 and it began asserting claims on a classwide basis. Facebook initially filed a motion to dismiss, which Outten Golden opposed.
Settlement talks began in spring 2017, said Jahan Sagafi, a civil rights attorney at Outten Golden.
“Those talks have continued through this week and ultimately culminated in the wonderful settlement,” Sagafi said. He described it as a “global settlement” that resolves the California case, as well as four other cases related to gender, age, and the housing discrimination claims.
David Berman, an Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady attorney, said the firm began settlement talks with Facebook in September. He said that, given the way advertising has evolved, settlements like this were important for ensuring that laws protecting certain groups are “updated to fit the new age.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Hershey's 'Bubble Yum' Hit With Consumer Class Action for Allegedly Containing 'Forever Chemicals'
'Rocket Docket': EDVA Judge Controls Google's Fate in Ad Tech Monopoly Trial
4 minute read'Effective Remedy'?: DOJ Unveils Corrective Action Plan in Google Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1OIG Progress Puts Connecticut in Leadership Position
- 2Bankruptcy Judge to Step Down in 2025
- 3Justices Seek Solicitor General's Views on Music Industry's Copyright Case Against ISP
- 4Judge to hear arguments on whether Google's advertising tech constitutes a monopoly
- 5'Big Law Had Become Too Woke': Why Bill Barr Moved On
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250