Why Millennials Should Give 'Managing Upward' a Chance
Not only can managing upward strengthen attorneys at all levels, it also aligns with some of the values many millennials hold dear, such as the desire to collaborate with others, eschew hierarchy, do meaningful and substantive work, take on early responsibility and establish strong professional mentor-mentee relationships.
March 20, 2019 at 10:52 PM
6 minute read
For many lawyers, management is a large part of daily life: management of time, risk, expectations and even others. Although everyone can recognize that effective management of more junior attorneys is vital to the success of any particular matter, it can be less obvious to manage upward, too. In fact, managing upward is something many attorneys already do with frequency when they organize the work of their team while simultaneously ensuring the team's work remains aligned with the goals of the client. The concept of managing upward, however, can be confusing to junior attorneys who are hesitant to overstep their bounds.
Managing upward can be helpful at all stages of a lawyer's career, including at junior levels. Imagine the following scenario. It is Friday evening, and a junior attorney receives an email asking for follow-up on work turned in to the more senior attorney several days ago. Because the supervising attorney did not have time to review the original work product until just an hour ago, they now need their follow-up questions answered on an urgent basis. The junior attorney realizes their plans for Friday night may be going for a toss. The supervising attorney feels unable to trust the work product of the junior attorney without clarifying answers from the associate. What does managing upward look like in day-to-day situations like this one, and could it have helped to prevent frustration on both sides?
The term managing upward may be somewhat of a misnomer. Various websites define it as finding ways to make a boss's job easier by managing him or her in the same way one would manage a subordinate. Although under this definition, managing upward may seemingly require the upward manager not only to handle their own job, but also take over the job of their supervisor, managing upward is actually more about being a superstar at one's own job. To manage upward is to take complete responsibility and ownership of one's part of the matter. Under this definition, managing upward will ultimately benefit both the junior attorney and the supervising attorney, not just the supervising attorney alone.
One of the best ways to manage upward is to anticipate a more senior attorney's needs. In order to do this successfully, an attorney usually must understand the long- and short-term goals of any given task or assignment and appreciate the larger context of how that task or assignment aligns with the life of the matter. Knowing this information may strengthen an attorney's work product and, therefore, may require less reframing or editing by supervisors. Further, being able to anticipate follow-up questions or tasks may provide the attorney with opportunities to be proactive in a manner that increases productivity and efficiency for the whole team. Anticipating and planning for project deadlines with the supervising attorney's availability is also a critical element of proactive project management.
It is important, however, to distinguish anticipating from guessing. Anticipation requires clear communication. This may involve effective listening by the junior attorney, including by asking questions, understanding expectations and receiving all necessary information from a supervising attorney or, conversely, effective communication of information, such as the assumptions the junior attorney is making or when the supervising attorney can expect an update (under promise and over deliver is a good adage here). Everyone will be happier with clear communication in a style that both works well for the supervising attorney and provides the junior attorney with the guidance they need.
Not only can managing upward strengthen attorneys at all levels, it also aligns with some of the values many millennials hold dear, such as the desire to collaborate with others, eschew hierarchy, do meaningful and substantive work, take on early responsibility and establish strong professional mentor-mentee relationships. But managing upward also may raise concerns regarding the impact on the mental health of attorneys who can feel increased pressure and expectation to do their own work, manage downward, as needed, and manage upward as well. Indeed, millennials, more than any other generation, feel the pressure to be perfect or compete with their peers, and these pressures may be amplified because of the perceived added expectations of managing upward. Managing upward is not an excuse for senior attorneys to shirk responsibility or to pass blame onto others. Rather, managing upward is a way for more junior attorneys to show their capability to think about the bigger picture and to provide solid work product. When things go wrong, it can be helpful to recall that all members of the team, including senior attorneys, are responsible for pulling their own weight. Managing upward does not require junior attorneys to take responsibility for things that are not reasonably expected of them in the first place.
In the imaginary scenario I discuss above, both the junior attorney and supervising attorney could have been left less frustrated, had the junior attorney anticipated the supervising attorney's availability to review the work product and his or her likely questions and needs after that review. This may have taken several forms, including asking questions to understand the context of the project and how the work product would be used, following up with the supervising attorney and conveying the preliminary results of what the junior attorney found or having a discussion regarding other factors that may affect how thorough the junior attorney should have been with the project, such as budget. The associate might have had a discussion with the senior attorney's assistant to learn about upcoming travel and other schedule issues.
Equally important, however, is to recognize that the supervising attorney could have been a more effective downward manager. Waiting to review a junior attorney's work—no matter how justified the delay may be—can frustrate younger attorneys who may require more time to understand and complete tasks in a meaningful manner. While dealing with less-than-perfect managers can be a reality for junior attorneys, managing upward can help millennials navigate and establish more productive and successful professional relationships.
Shilpa Coorg is an associate at Winston & Strawn in Los Angeles. She focuses her practice on patent litigation, including pharmaceutical litigation under Hatch-Waxman. She represents and advises industry leaders on intellectual property matters across a broad spectrum of technologies.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSouthern California Law Firms Boast Industry-Leading Revenue, Demand Through Q3
Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
Lost in the Legal Maze: How State Regulations Are Hindering Hemp Operators' Success
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250