Could a copyright case about an iconic photograph of Michael Jordan prove irresistible to a basketball-loving Supreme Court? Especially if it’s a chance to dunk on the Ninth Circuit? We might have an answer Monday morning.
The justices have relisted for Friday’s conference Rentmeester v. Nike, a case about a 35-year-old photograph of Jordan that photography groups are framing as a referendum on their art.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
