PG&E Legal Bills Already Top $84M for Chapter 11 Case
Pacific Gas and Electric Co. paid Cravath, Swaine & Moore over $75 million, while Weil, Gotshal & Manges, Jenner & Block and Keller & Benvenutti have each brought in several million dollars from the utility company's bankruptcy.
April 02, 2019 at 10:18 PM
4 minute read
Four outside law firms have billed Pacific Gas and Electric Co. at least $84 million for legal services related to the company's January bankruptcy filing,
The utility company disclosed its legal spend in a series of court filings last month, as it sought approval from U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Dennis Montali to continue employing the law firms.
PG&E is seeking to retain Cravath, Swaine & Moore; Weil, Gotshal & Manges; Jenner & Block; and Keller & Benvenutti as its legal advisers for the Chapter 11 proceedings.
PG&E listed more than $50 billion in estimated liabilities when it filed for Chapter 11 protection. According to the court docket, Montali is scheduled to consider PG&E and the firms' motions at a hearing April 9.
The utility giant said it has paid Cravath, which is PG&E's lead coordinating counsel in wildfire-related matters, roughly $75.7 million leading up to the bankruptcy filing. According to court papers filed March 22, PG&E's payments to Cravath included a $10 million retainer from which the firm had drawn only about $3 million.
The firm intends to apply the rest of the retainer to any outstanding amounts for PG&E-related costs that it did not bill for before the filing, or as credit toward any services arising after the filing, the filing said. In addition to representing PG&E in Chapter 11 proceedings, Cravath has advised the utility for over a year on corporate governance, strategic transaction and financing matters, court documents said.
Last year, PG&E hired a team from Cravath, including chairman Evan Chesler and litigation partners Timothy Cameron, Kevin Orsini and Damaris Hernández, as defense counsel in 200-plus suits stemming from fires in Northern California. The company also turned to Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati and Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan to handle those cases.
Cravath worked closely with Weil on PG&E restructuring alternatives, but Weil billed far less. According to another court filing filed March 13, Weil received over $4.7 million from PG&E in the 90 days leading up to the company's bankruptcy filing, and also has a remaining balance of $1.5 million on a fee advance from PG&E, which the firm said it will use to pay for the outstanding amounts that it did not bill for before the filing.
PG&E has hired Chicago-based Jenner & Block as special corporate defense counsel for state and federal regulatory matters during the Chapter 11 proceedings. Jenner & Block is also handling a criminal case involving PG&E, connected to a natural gas explosion that occurred in the city of San Bruno, California, in September 2010. According to the March 15 court filing, PG&E has paid the firm $3.57 million during the year leading up to the Chapter 11 filing.
San Francisco based Keller & Benvenutti is also representing PG&E in bankruptcy court. Since May 2018, the firm has advised PG&E on legal and financial matters regarding potential liabilities resulting from 2017 and 2018 Northern California wildfires. Court papers filed March 11 said the firm has received $383,635 in the 90 days before the Chapter 11 filing.
In separate court documents supporting PG&E's motion, the court papers also revealed the hourly rate of the four firms. Cravath attorneys are charging at rates of $415 to $1,500 per hour, while Weil attorneys charge $560 to $1,600 per hour. Jenner & Block attorneys charge PG&E at hourly rates ranging from $400 to $982 and Keller & Benvenutti attorneys are charging at $400 to $800 per hour.
|Read More
Cravath Advises PG&E on Reorganization in Aftermath of California Wildfires
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: A $604.9M Trade Secrets Verdict With a Big Assist From a Juror Question
Securities Case Over Hawaiian Electric Company's Wildfire Readiness Dismissed
2 minute readFTC Bans Exec From Chevron Board—Exercising Authority It Doesn't Have, GOP Dissenters Say
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Recent Decisions Regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- 2The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 3Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 4For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 5As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250