Bay Area In-House Hiring Could Get a Bump from Tech's IPO Rush
The rush of public offerings—with Lyft's already launching its IPO, and Uber, Slack, Pinterest and Airbnb poised to follow suit—could heat up the Bay Area's market for in-house counsel.
April 03, 2019 at 11:36 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
A flood of tech startups' initial public offerings could boost the Bay Area's in-house counsel market in 2019, recruiters said, as companies' legal departments grow to meet new compliance requirements.
San Francisco-based ride-hailing company Lyft Inc. beat rival Uber Technologies Inc. to the IPO punch last week. Uber is still set to go public this year, alongside Bay Area neighbors Pinterest Inc., Slack and Airbnb Inc. In a 2017 interview with The Recorder affiliate Corporate Counsel, Lyft general counsel Kristin Sverchek hinted she would hire more securities counsel post-IPO.
“It's a candidate-driven market, with the current demand we're seeing,” said Jamy Sullivan, the executive director of legal employment agency Robert Half Legal. She said the demand for in-house counsel at tech companies is already high, growing last year with momentum she expects to see continue this year.
Kate Reder Sheikh, the managing director in the associate practice group for Major, Lindsey & Africa, said she's also seen an increasing demand for securities lawyers versus lawyers with emerging growth company experience. While the latter is still in demand, she said the Bay Area's market for counsel with capital markets experience will “go way up.”
The problem with a high demand for securities lawyers, Reder Sheikh said, is that the Bay Area currently can't keep up with the demand, as many securities lawyers opt for careers in New York or London. But she added that could change with firms and companies “importing quite a bit of talent” from more established markets. Sullivan said companies are willing to bring in candidates from outside markets.
Even with a strong candidates market, prospective in-house counsel may want to develop skills that help them stand out. Reder Sheikh and Sullivan said there are certain traits companies are looking for in new hires.
“I think what we're going to see as part of this transition is that as part of the package of a generalist corporate lawyer, they're going to want people who for sure have that capital markets notch in their belts,” Reder Sheikh said. “Because if we're looking at people who are just straight M&A, they're not going to be suitable candidates for this environment.”
Sullivan said lawyers with business acumen, privacy and compliance skills also have an edge in the Bay Area in-house market. Experience with intellectual property is also a plus at many tech companies, she added.
Companies can help stand out in a candidate-driven market by offering financial incentives, such as competitive salaries, benefits and bonuses, and work-life balance, professional development opportunities and a healthy work culture.
“As well as having client interaction or challenging projects,” Sullivan said. “And, of course, taking a company IPO, filing all of that, would be a challenging process.”
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCollectible Maker Funko Wins Motion to Dismiss Securities Class Action
How Tony West Used Transparency to Reform Uber's Toxic Culture
What Paul Grewal Has Learned About Advocacy as Coinbase's Top Lawyer
7 minute readShowered With Stock, Tech GCs Incentivized to 'Knock It Out of the Park'
Trending Stories
- 1Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
- 2Special Section: Products Liability, Mass Torts & Class Action/Personal Injury
- 3The Elliott Management vs. Southwest Airlines Faceoff: Who Won and What Determined the Outcome?
- 4November Court of Appeals Roundup
- 5Trellis Launches Trellis AI, a New Suite of Automated Litigation Tools
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250