Bay Area In-House Hiring Could Get a Bump from Tech's IPO Rush
The rush of public offerings—with Lyft's already launching its IPO, and Uber, Slack, Pinterest and Airbnb poised to follow suit—could heat up the Bay Area's market for in-house counsel.
April 03, 2019 at 11:36 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
A flood of tech startups' initial public offerings could boost the Bay Area's in-house counsel market in 2019, recruiters said, as companies' legal departments grow to meet new compliance requirements.
San Francisco-based ride-hailing company Lyft Inc. beat rival Uber Technologies Inc. to the IPO punch last week. Uber is still set to go public this year, alongside Bay Area neighbors Pinterest Inc., Slack and Airbnb Inc. In a 2017 interview with The Recorder affiliate Corporate Counsel, Lyft general counsel Kristin Sverchek hinted she would hire more securities counsel post-IPO.
“It's a candidate-driven market, with the current demand we're seeing,” said Jamy Sullivan, the executive director of legal employment agency Robert Half Legal. She said the demand for in-house counsel at tech companies is already high, growing last year with momentum she expects to see continue this year.
Kate Reder Sheikh, the managing director in the associate practice group for Major, Lindsey & Africa, said she's also seen an increasing demand for securities lawyers versus lawyers with emerging growth company experience. While the latter is still in demand, she said the Bay Area's market for counsel with capital markets experience will “go way up.”
The problem with a high demand for securities lawyers, Reder Sheikh said, is that the Bay Area currently can't keep up with the demand, as many securities lawyers opt for careers in New York or London. But she added that could change with firms and companies “importing quite a bit of talent” from more established markets. Sullivan said companies are willing to bring in candidates from outside markets.
Even with a strong candidates market, prospective in-house counsel may want to develop skills that help them stand out. Reder Sheikh and Sullivan said there are certain traits companies are looking for in new hires.
“I think what we're going to see as part of this transition is that as part of the package of a generalist corporate lawyer, they're going to want people who for sure have that capital markets notch in their belts,” Reder Sheikh said. “Because if we're looking at people who are just straight M&A, they're not going to be suitable candidates for this environment.”
Sullivan said lawyers with business acumen, privacy and compliance skills also have an edge in the Bay Area in-house market. Experience with intellectual property is also a plus at many tech companies, she added.
Companies can help stand out in a candidate-driven market by offering financial incentives, such as competitive salaries, benefits and bonuses, and work-life balance, professional development opportunities and a healthy work culture.
“As well as having client interaction or challenging projects,” Sullivan said. “And, of course, taking a company IPO, filing all of that, would be a challenging process.”
Read More:
As the Gig Economy Goes Public, Labor Regulations Still Pose Risk
Uber and Lyft's Race to Go Public Is a First for Both Companies' GCs
Wilson Sonsini Rides Ride-Hailing Boom, Sharing in Lyft IPO Fees
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKraken’s Chief Legal Officer Exits, Eyes Role in Trump Administration
3 minute readCollectible Maker Funko Wins Motion to Dismiss Securities Class Action
How Tony West Used Transparency to Reform Uber's Toxic Culture
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250