In Pinterest IPO, Skadden, Cleary, Potter Anderson Share $2M in Legal Fees
Pinterest's IPO has generated $2 million in legal fees, with the company expected to begin trading next week.
April 08, 2019 at 06:02 PM
3 minute read
Pinterest's initial public offering has generated $2 million in legal fees for the three firms guiding the deal—New York-based white-shoe law firm Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton; underwriter counsel Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom; and Delaware midsize firm Potter Anderson & Corroon.
The social media company, whose stock is expected to begin trading next week, disclosed the legal fees and expenses in an updated prospectus filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Monday.
In the filing, Pinterest revealed that it plans to sell 75 million shares for between $15 and $17 in its upcoming offering, which at the midpoint of the price range would raise roughly $1.2 billion, according to The Wall Street Journal. That puts the company's valuation at between $10 billion and $11.3 billion, valuing it below the $12 billion at which the online image-search company sourced its last fundraising in 2017.
Pinterest, which launched in 2010, has said in its filings that it reaches more than 250 million monthly active users, also referred to as “Pinners.” The company is expected to start trading next week on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “PINS.”
The Cleary corporate team working on the dual-class structure for Pinterest are partners Ethan Klingsberg, Jeffrey Karpf and Pamela Marcogliese, according to the social media network's filing.
In a statement issued March 22, Cleary said it has worked on dual- and multi-class share structures for company clients, including serving as lead counsel to the shareholders of Levi Strauss & Co.'s IPO. That company adopted a dual-class capital structure to help the Haas family—descendants of founder Levi Strauss—retain control of decision making for the company.
The Skadden team, which is advising the underwriters in the IPO, is led by longtime corporate partner Gregg Noel and associates Allison Hunter, Alice Thai and Brittany Wightman, the firm said.
Potter Anderson acted as the special Delaware counsel for Pinterest for the S-1 filing, as the company is incorporated in Delaware.
According to a statement released by Potter Anderson Monday, Delaware matters related to the social media network's public debut are being handled by corporate partners Michael Tumas and Roxanne Houtman and senior associate Dave DiDonato. Tumas previously chaired the firm's executive committee before passing on the role to Kathleen Furey McDonough in 2017.
Potter Anderson also noted in its statement that its attorneys are experienced in advising clients on dual- and multi-class structures, and worked on similar deals for companies such as Alphabet, Snap Inc., Liberty Media Corp. and Qurate Retail Group.
Pinterest is among a host of large tech IPOs anticipated this year, including ride-hailing company Lyft's offering last month. Like many other startups planning IPOs, Pinterest reported a net loss last year. But its loss was $63 million in 2018, which was less than half its prior-year deficit of $130 million, according to SEC filings.
The company reported $756 million in 2018 revenue in its IPO prospectus, showing revenue growth of 60 percent year over year.
|Read more
Wilson Sonsini Rides Ride-Hailing Boom, Sharing in Lyft IPO Fees
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFTC Bans Exec From Chevron Board—Exercising Authority It Doesn't Have, GOP Dissenters Say
5 minute readDeal Watch: Latham, Ropes, S&C, Cravath and Simpson Advise on Massive Paramount/Skydance Deal
6 minute readMunger Tolles Advises New Stability AI CEO, Executive Chairman in Funding Deal
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250