What Do Cannabis Companies Look for in In-House Attorneys?
Those in the industry say that while cannabis law expertise is important, those with a corporate background to help the expansion of their companies will be among the first offered jobs for the in-house legal department.
April 22, 2019 at 07:02 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Having direct experience in the cannabis industry may help with getting a job in the legal department at an expanding cannabis company, but experts say it takes more than industry knowledge.
In March, Mike Evers, the founder of Evers Legal Search, was contracted to help Chicago-based Grassroots Cannabis find its first general counsel. Usually, Evers explained, he gets a middle-of-the-road response with attorneys wanting to learn more about the specific role. However, the lawyers he has approached for the position have either been excited at the prospect of helping expand the industry or showing they do not believe in cannabis legalization.
"People are self-identifying right away," Evers explained.
A number of attorneys at firms are familiar with the changing cannabis laws, Evers said.
"The right person to run these new legal departments are going to be generalists with corporate backgrounds," he said. "What I learned once I dove in is that they're [Grassroots Cannabis] not looking for an industry expert."
He explained that at the general counsel level the successful candidate will likely already be a general counsel of a publicly traded company or in the legal department working close to the general counsel.
Many of the legal departments for these expanding companies are small and may grow only depending on how the company grows.
Jean Gonnell, who was recently hired as the second general counsel for Strainwise Consulting in Colorado, said right now she is the company's only in-house attorney. However, she does plan on hiring in the future.
"I'd prefer to keep it small for now," Gonnell said of the size of her legal department. "It depends on when things change and Strainwise is expanding. The department needs to expand with the company."
Matt Miller, the general counsel of Green Thumb Industries Inc. in Chicago, said there are two other in-house attorneys at the company and the legal department is hiring. He said he is not sure of the size of the legal department he wants to create.
"Given the complexities of what we do and our company's continued growth, it is important that our legal team is staffed with the right number of lawyers and has the right mix of skills to always be one step ahead of everyone else," Miller said in an email to Corporate Counsel.
Gonnell said she plans on hiring people with corporate experience, regardless of industry, though she is not likely to consider attorneys who have a criminal defense background.
"The transfer from criminal defense to civil administrative law is very difficult," Gonnell explained.
Regulatory and business experience will be necessary for an in-house attorney at a cannabis company since the legal or illegal use of medical and/or recreational cannabis is governed on the municipal, state and federal levels. California, for example, allows medical and adult recreational use of cannabis, but some cities and counties have limited or banned dispensaries while a lawsuit against the state's cannabis control department over deliveries was recently filed.
Miller said as far as recruiting for his own department he tries to keep an open mind by not excluding lawyers from consideration who practice in a particular industry. He did say, however, the stereotypical risk-averse attorneys may not be able to thrive in the cannabis industry.
"Regardless of the industry, if your background demonstrates that you can be comfortable with the uncomfortable, and that you thrive under pressure, then we should talk," Miller said. "I suppose if your entire background shows a gravitation towards very hierarchical and structured work environments where it takes 10 meetings to make a decision and 14 committees to execute on that decision, that might be a problem, but other than that, I want to find the best people, period."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSidley Austin Adds Cooley Capital Markets Partner in Century City, San Francisco
An ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
Davis Polk Moves to New, Expanded Redwood City Office
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250