First-Ever Audit of Judicial Watchdog Faults 'Missed Opportunities'
The report also concluded the Commission on Judicial Performance too often operates in secrecy and improperly mixes its roles of investigator and disciplinarian.
April 25, 2019 at 05:55 PM
5 minute read
California's judicial watchdog agency has failed to fully investigate certain complaints against judges and needs a big infusion of funding and a possible overhaul by voters, the state auditor said in a report released Thursday.
The long-awaited 91-page audit of the Commission on Judicial Performance, or CJP, found that in 11 of 30 sampled complaints alleging judicial misbehavior, investigators did not take “all reasonable steps” to confirm the allegations, which included threatening to assault litigants, having a relationship with a subordinate and improperly delegating judicial work to clerks. Six of those cases were closed without discipline. The other five resulted in a judge being privately reprimanded.
The report also concluded that the 59-year-old agency too often operates in secrecy and improperly mixes its roles of investigator and disciplinarian.
“The CJP has missed opportunities to fully investigate allegations of misconduct, has a structure and processes for discipline that do not align with best practices and falls short of the intent of the voters, and has failed to ensure it is sufficiently transparent and accessible to the public,” state Auditor Elaine Howle wrote.
The audit follows a two-year legal fight over whether Howle's team should have access to the commission's confidential disciplinary records. Under terms of a settlement reached in September, the auditor was able to scrutinize the agency's practices for the first time in its history.
“I see the results in the audit and I'm definitely committed to doing what I can to improve the work of the commission,” said Gregory Dresser, the commission's director and chief counsel.
The report found that investigators did not always explore all potential evidence in a case if they ran up against obstacles such as having to listen through numerous audio recordings to find a judge's allegedly improper courtroom comments.
“In another example, CJP investigators confirmed that the judge had improperly delegated judicial authority by allowing court staff to perform certain duties,” the report said. “However, despite the fact that CJP visited the court more than once, investigators never interviewed the court staff who were involved in this improper practice.”
The agency also fails to look for patterns of misbehavior in judges, the report concluded, noting that the commission received eight similar allegations of on-the-bench misconduct against one judge over a five-year period but did not pursue discipline until one complainant produced a transcript. The judge ultimately agreed “in a confidential settlement” to resign and never seek office again.
The report recommends that the state provide $419,000 to the commission to pay for a new case management system and to hire an investigations manager to better track patterns in complaints.
Howle also called on the Legislature to ask voters to approve a constitutional amendment that would separate the commission's investigative and disciplinary duties. Currently, the commission considers allegations against a judge and decides whether staff should investigate them. That same panel votes on what, if any, discipline that judge should receive.
“The unitary structure allows commissioners who make disciplinary decisions to be privy to allegations of and facts about possible misconduct that should not factor into their decisions about discipline,” the report said.
The auditor is also recommending that the commission itself oversee evidentiary hearings instead of leaving the task to a three-judge panel of special masters.
State lawmakers approved the audit of the CJP in 2016 amid complaints by judges who said the disciplinary process lacked due process for the accused and by family law litigants who complained that the agency is too lax in pursuing misconduct.
“This report represents a milestone in our efforts to protect the public from egregious judicial misconduct that is destroying people's lives,” said Kathleen Russell, executive director of the Center for Judicial Excellence, one of the groups that lobbied for the audit. “We hope that a few brave legislators will step up to implement the auditor's recommendations—the public is counting on their courage and leadership to get a constitutional amendment on the ballot to reform the CJP and better protect them.”
Read the audit below:
||
Read more:
Judicial Discipline Records Face First-Ever Audit After Deal Ends Dustup
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSanta Clara County Superior Court Authorizes Electronic Recording of Proceedings
4 minute readRegulatory Upheaval Is Coming. How Businesses Prepare and Respond Will Separate Winners and Losers
California-Based Portal Crypto Exchange Faces Delaware Investor Class Action
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Why Kramer Levin Decided to Merge
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 3Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 4US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 5Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250