Jury Rejects Plaintiffs' Negligence Claim Over Grandfather's Swimming Pool Death
A California jury has ruled that a homeowners association was not negligent in connection with the death of a man in its swimming pool.
May 01, 2019 at 05:06 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
|
This story is reprinted with permission from the Insurance Coverage Law Center, the industry's only comprehensive digital resource designed for insurance coverage law professionals. Visit the website to subscribe.
A California jury has ruled that a homeowners association was not negligent in connection with the death of a man in its swimming pool.
Facts and Allegations
On June 29, 2015, Alik Khachikyan, 59, was discovered in the outdoor swimming pool of the Stocker Gardens apartment complex in Glendale, California. He had been visiting his daughter, Dazmira Khachikyan, who lived in the complex with her husband and children, when he fell in the pool and was pronounced dead from drowning a short time later.
His widow and four adult children sued the homeowners association that owned and operated the building where the pool was located for negligence.
Ms. Khachikyan's 3 1/2-year-old son was the only witness, and he testified that he saw his grandfather walking near the pool when his foot hit a potted agave plant, which caused him to fall into the pool and drown. The plaintiffs' counsel argued that the potted plant was an obstruction that violated the Los Angeles County Building Code because it was within four feet of the pool.
The defense's safety and human factors expert and pool expert both testified that the building code was not violated and that the pool was safe. The pool expert also presented testimony and evidence showing that the pool had been inspected by the county and that there were no violations related to the potted plant.
The defense's expert child psychiatrist opined that child witnesses were not reliable. In addition, defense counsel noted that during cross-examination, the decedent's grandson admitted on the stand that his mother had told him to say that his grandfather had hit his right foot on the plant.
The parties established a $1 million/$75,000 high/low agreement.
Result
The jury rendered a defense verdict, concluding that the homeowners' association had not been negligent in the use or maintenance of the property. Thus, the decedent's family recovered the high/low agreement's $75,000 minimum amount.
The case is Khachikyan v. Stocker Garden Homeowners Ass'n, No. BC658051 (Cal. Super. Ct. L.A. Co. March 19, 2019). Attorneys involved include: Eric C. Bonholtzer; Ball & Bonholtzer; for Dazmira Khachikyan, Arsen Khachikyan, Kristine Khachikyan, Lilit Khachikyan, Aida Khojoyan, Estate of Alik Khachikyan; Richard H. Martha; Horton, Oberrecht, Kirkpatrick & Martha, APC; San Diego, CA for 551 Stocker Garden Homeowners Association; Erin E. Schroeder; Horton, Oberrecht, Kirkpatrick & Martha, APC; San Diego, CA for 551 Stocker Garden Homeowners Association.
Insurance Coverage Law Report Comment
This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiffs' and defense counsel. Additional information was gleaned from court documents.
To see the full detailed report from our ALM partner, VerdictSearch, please click here.
Steven A. Meyerowitz, a Harvard Law School graduate, is the founder and president of Meyerowitz Communications Inc., a law firm marketing communications consulting company. Mr. Meyerowitz is the Director of the Insurance Coverage Law Center and editor-in-chief of journals on insurance law, banking law, bankruptcy law, energy law, government contracting law, and privacy and cybersecurity law, among other subjects. He may be contacted at smeyerowitz@
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A Wake Up Call to the Life Insurance Industry:' California Sues Insurers
3 minute readFederal Judge Sides With Lyft Driver in Contractual Dispute Over $1M Uninsured Motorist Coverage
5 minute readFormer CVS Exec Faces Trade Secrets Suit for Allegedly Helping Chickasaw Nation Case
3 minute readFacing a Shrinking Talent Pool, Insurance Defense Firms Are Fighting to Add Attorneys
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250