Uber Gets Former Firm Quinn Emanuel Booted From Handling Former Rival's Antitrust Case
A federal magistrate judge in San Francisco found that Quinn Emanuel's prior defense of Uber in a case where a Maryland taxi company was bringing predatory pricing claims had "substantial relationship" to the case the firm was pursuing on behalf of defunct Uber rival Sidecar.
May 02, 2019 at 06:57 PM
2 minute read
A federal judge in San Francisco on Thursday disqualified lawyers at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan from representing defunct ride-hailing service Sidecar in an antitrust lawsuit against the law firm's former client Uber Technologies Inc.
U.S. Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph Spero found that the firm's work defending Uber from predatory pricing claims brought in a 2014 lawsuit from a Maryland taxi company had a “substantial relationship” to the case the firm's lawyers were pursuing on behalf of Sidecar.
Spero wrote that “it is reasonable for Uber to expect that Quinn Emanuel would not now serve as counsel to a plaintiff bringing antitrust claims based on Uber's alleged conduct during the same time that Quinn Emanuel served as Uber's sole outside litigation counsel and defended Uber against unfair competition and antitrust claims—including at least some claims turning on factual questions underlying the case at hand.”
Lawyers at Quinn Emanuel had tried to distinguish the Maryland case from their work for Sidecar by pointing out that the earlier case dealt with Uber's noncompliance with regulated prices for cab fares where the Sidecar case dealt with allegations that Uber was charging below-cost prices aimed at eliminating competition in the market for ride-hailing software. Spero, however, noted in Thursday's opinion that the “the software-only market definition on which Sidecar relies to distinguish [the Maryland case] was a legal strategy that Quinn Emanuel pioneered for Uber in the years in which it served as Uber's litigation counsel.”
Uber's lead outside counsel, Theodore Boutrous Jr. of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, referred a request for comment to the company. Uber representatives didn't immediately respond to messages.
Robert Feldman of Quinn Emanuel declined to comment.
Read the opinion:
Read more:
In Fight to Stay in Case Against Former Client Uber, Quinn Emanuel Faces Skeptical Judge
Quinn Emanuel Pushes Back Against Uber's Disqualification Bid in Sidecar Case
Gibson Dunn Steps In for Uber, Asks to Boot Quinn From Repping Sidecar
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
K&L Gates Files String of Suits Against Electronics Manufacturer's Competitors, Brightness Misrepresentations
3 minute read
Meta Workers Aren't of One Mind on Company's Retreat From DEI, Fact-Checking
California Court Denies Apple's Motion to Strike Allegations in Gender Bias Class Action
White & Case KOs Claims Against Voltage LLC in Solar Companies' Trade Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1LexisNexis Announces Public Availability of Personalized AI Assistant Protégé
- 2Some Thoughts on What It Takes to Connect With Millennial Jurors
- 3Artificial Wisdom or Automated Folly? Practical Considerations for Arbitration Practitioners to Address the AI Conundrum
- 4The New Global M&A Kings All Have Something in Common
- 5Big Law Aims to Make DEI Less Divisive in Trump's Second Term
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
