Fishy Business? Commercial Fisherman Accuses Duane Morris and Former Partner of Malpractice, Fraud
Commercial fisherman Gerard “Jerry” Wetle alleges in a newly filed federal lawsuit that former Duane Morris partner Zhaoyang “Paul” Li held himself out as an adviser only to cut him out of a business set up to export squid to China.
May 07, 2019 at 03:57 PM
3 minute read
A commercial fisherman has sued Duane Morris and former partner Zhaoyang “Paul” Li claiming that Li inserted himself as a partner in a seafood export business and cut the fisherman out of the deal.
Gerard “Jerry” Wetle, a commercial fisherman, boat owner and wholesaler now based in Oregon, claims in a complaint filed Monday in federal court in the Northern District of California that Li convinced him he didn't need his own lawyer when setting up a business with a partner to catch squid and export them for sale in China. Wetle, who previously was based in Salinas, California, claims he fired his own lawyer upon Li's advise. He further alleges that he signed on to a $2.6 million purchase agreement for a boat named “Pamela Rose” to benefit the export business, spent nearly six months in Mexico refitting it, and traveled to China to negotiate with vendors, only to be cut out of the export business.
“Li never informed Wetle, in writing or otherwise, that Wetle should seek the advice of independent counsel before going into business with Li or at any time while Li was working with Wetle or representing to others that he was working with Wetle in fishing businesses,” wrote Wetle's current lawyer, Mark Choate of the Choate Law Firm in Juneau, Alaska. The complaint claims that Li encouraged Wetle to fire his personal attorney and “did not advise Wetle to consult with independent counsel because Li intended to use his stature as a partner in a large national law firm, legal knowledge, and role as an attorney, to take advantage of and defraud Wetle.”
The suit brings claims of fraud, legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty against both Li, who is now a partner in the intellectual property practice at Taylor English Duma in San Francisco, and his former firm Duane Morris. The complaint claims that Li worked on the export business from Duane Morris' San Francisco office, used his firm email account, stationary and resources on the underlying deals—including meetings held at Duane Morris—and got assistance from Duane Morris personnel. ”Li thus acted within his actual or apparent authority as a Duane Morris partner in defrauding Wetle,” the complaint says.
Reached by phone Tuesday, Choate said that it was a “fairly extraordinary” situation to see a big-firm attorney provide advice on deals while holding a significant stake and conflicting loyalties.
“Li created this series of different businesses all to capitalize on Wetle's knowledge and connections in the industry and ultimately left Wetle wondering what in the world happened,” Choate said. “It's not something you see with big firms and their lawyers. Big firms tend to be aware of their conflicts.”
“We don't know why Li left the firm, but it's conduct that's very, very unusual. You just don't see it and the California rules are pretty straightforward you can't do this without taking the necessary steps to inform” your client about potential conflicts, Choate said.
Duane Morris did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Reached at his Taylor English email address, Li asked that all correspondence be directed to his private email address. He did not respond to further request for comment.
Read the complaint:
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSettlement Negotiations Taking Shape in Class Action Against Poppi Prebiotic Sodas
2 minute readK&L Gates Secures $10.5M Verdict for Washington Meat Retailer in Lawsuit Over 'Boneless' Chicken Product
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250