California Judiciary Would Get 25 New Judges in Revised Budget Proposal
Judges and court administrators along with the plaintiffs bar and defense counsel have lobbied for more than a decade for the new jurists.
May 09, 2019 at 06:14 PM
4 minute read
A revised budget proposal unveiled by Gov. Gavin Newsom on Thursday adds $30 million to the judiciary to pay for 25 new trial court judgeships, addressing one of the top priorities of judicial branch leaders and attorneys' groups this year.
The new bench positions, if approved by the Legislature during budget negotiations, would finally fund half of the 50 judgeships that lawmakers created—but did not provide money for—in 2007.
Judges and court administrators along with the plaintiffs bar and defense counsel have lobbied for more than a decade for the new jurists with limited success. Gov. Jerry Brown, in his final budget, funded just two of the 50 judgeships last year, sending both to Riverside County.
Now, with a flush state budget heading toward what is likely to be an easy passage in the Legislature next month, Newsom said he is ready to provide the funding needed for the new judges and their related staff.
At a press conference, the governor cited Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye “for her leadership and her stubbornness, which I say very proudly, in demanding that these dollars are there on behalf of the courts. She's been rightfully frustrated that we have provided for judges but we haven't funded the judges. And finally we're in a position to fund at least 25 judges.”
Newsom's original $209 billion state budget proposal, released in January, included an additional $327 million for the judiciary, including new money for branch technology projects, deferred maintenance, a boost in spending for increased employee health and retirement costs, and $9.5 million for pay hikes for appellate court and Judicial Council workers.
The governor's updated spending plan maintains those expenditures while adding another $33.9 million in federal and state funding for more attorneys in dependency cases, $20 million for legal aid for renters in landlord-tenant disputes, almost $10 million for additional interpreters and $5 million to handle an increase in appellate case workload.
The proposal also raises a 1% cap on the amount of reserves that trial courts can carry to 3%, another top priority of judiciary leaders.
“The governor's revision to his state budget proposal reflects his deep support for our goal of achieving equal access to justice for all Californians—wherever they live,” Cantil-Sakauye said in a prepared statement.
The creation of 25 new judgeships would give Newsom some of his first judicial appointments after Brown filled almost every vacancy before he left in January.
Newsom said Thursday that he and his judicial appointments secretary, former First District Court of Appeal Justice Martin Jenkins, will place an emphasis on diversity, “not just from the perspective of race or ethnicity but also geography, age—a bench that represents not just a prosecutorial bent but a defense bent, a consumer bent, an individual liberty bent. We're broadening that scope.”
Where any new judges go will depend on the findings of a judicial needs study due out in late summer. A preliminary assessment done last year shows that the Inland Empire—Riverside and San Bernardino counties—are most in need of new judges. Other courts in the Central Valley, including Kern, San Joaquin, Fresno and Stanislaus counties, are also likely to receive some of the new judgeships.
Nancy Drabble, chief executive officer of the Consumer Attorneys of California, said the additional judges should “alleviate backlogs of civil cases, which have faced major delays in many regions of the state.”
Read more:
Judiciary's Demand for More Money and Judges Greets Newsom
Newsom Picks Appellate Justice Jenkins for Judicial Appointments Secretary
Calif. Governor Names Boies Schiller's Ann O'Leary Chief of Staff
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFresh lawsuit hits Oregon city at the heart of Supreme Court ruling on homeless encampments
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250